Japan adopts earnings stripping rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Japan adopts earnings stripping rules

japan-flag2.jpg

As part of the 2012 Tax Reform, Japan adopted earnings-stripping provisions under which a corporation's deduction for net interest expense paid to a related party will be limited to 50% of adjusted income effective for tax years beginning on or after April 1 2013.

shikuma.jpg

mizutani.jpg

Michael Shikuma


Takeo Mizutani

A related party is any: (i) person with whom the corporation has a 50% of more equity relationship; (ii) person with whom the corporation has a de-facto controlling or controlled relationship; or (iii) third party lender which is financially guaranteed by a person in (i) or (ii). Net interest is the difference between the interest paid to related parties and any interest income which corresponds to such interest paid. Interest paid to related parties includes interest and interest in the form of lease payments or guarantee payments, but excludes back-to-back repo interest and interest paid to a related party lender which is subject to Japan corporation tax. Corresponding interest income includes a pro rata portion of interest income and interest in the form of lease payments received based on the ratio of interest from related parties to total gross interest income, but excludes interest income from resident related parties, domestic corporations, and nonresidents and foreign corporations with a permanent establishment in Japan.

Adjusted income is taxable income to which is added back (or subtracted) net interest expense, depreciation expense, excluded dividend income, and extraordinary loss (or income).

Net interest expense which exceeds 50% of adjusted income is not deductible, but may be carried forward for up to seven years and deducted in such future tax year up to the 50% threshold computed for that tax year. In addition, the unused carryforward amount of a disappearing corporation in a tax qualified merger, or 100% subsidiary in a liquidation, is transferred to the surviving, or parent corporation.

The limitation does not apply if net interest expense for the tax year is ¥10 million ($125,000) or less, or if interest paid to related parties (after deducting back-to-back repo interest, but before deducting corresponding interest income from third parties or nonresidents) is 50% or less of the total interest expense (excluding interest paid to related parties which is subject to corporation tax).

In the case of a corporation which is part of a consolidated group tax filing, the excess of the corporation's net interest (excluding interest of other consolidated group members) over 50% of the adjusted consolidated income, is not deductible.

Where the thin capitalisation interest limitations apply (when the debt-to-equity ratio exceeds 3:1), the deductible interest expense is the lower of the limit under either the thin capitalisation or these earnings stripping rules. If the corporation is subject to the anti-tax haven (controlled foreign corporation) rule, the nondeductible interest paid to the tax haven company (the corporation's foreign subsidiary) is reduced to the extent that the corporation is subject to current tax on the interest income of the tax haven company.

Michael Shikuma (mshikuma@mofo.com) & Takeo Mizutani (tmizutani@mofo.com)

Morrison & Foerster

Tel:+ 81 3 3214 6522

Website: www.mofo.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
Gift this article