Significant amendments to Canadian foreign affiliate rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Significant amendments to Canadian foreign affiliate rules

On August 19 2011, the Canadian Department of Finance released a package of proposed amendments including significant changes to the tax rules governing the taxation of income earned by foreign affiliates of Canadian taxpayers (the proposals).

van-loan.jpg
jones.jpg

Chris Van Loan

Josh Jones

One of the more significant changes included in the proposals is a new rule which could give rise to an income inclusion for a Canadian taxpayer where a foreign affiliate has made an upstream loan that remains in existence for two years or more. Canadian taxpayers will have until August 19 2013 to deal with existing structures affected by this new rule.

Another significant change is the introduction of a hybrid surplus pool which will encompass a foreign affiliate's gains and losses from the disposition of shares of foreign affiliates and certain other property. This rule is intended to eliminate the advantages gained by Canadian taxpayers from entering into certain transactions whereby shares of foreign affiliates are sold within a foreign affiliate group on a non-rollover basis to generate exempt surplus, which could be returned to Canada by way of tax-free dividends, but will have broader application.

Other changes included in the proposals include a new approach intended to simplify the characterisation of distributions from foreign affiliates and revisions to the rules governing acquisitions, dispositions and reorganisations of foreign affiliates.

These proposals represent the most significant package of amendments affecting foreign affiliates of Canadian taxpayers since 2004. Due to the introduction of some of these proposed amendments, a number of previously announced proposals are being abandoned. Since a number of amendments have retroactive application to transactions that occurred before August 19 2011, either on an automatic or elective basis, it is important that taxpayers review both current and past transactions to determine the impact of the proposals and whether any such elections should be made.

Chris Van Loan (chris.vanloan@blakes.com), partner, and Josh Jones (josh.jones@blakes.com), associate, Toronto

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 416 863 2400

Fax: +1 416 863-2653

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
The case sits within a context of Brazil signalling that it is replacing informal discretion and ambiguity with structures that reward analytical rigour, one expert tells ITR
Jeff Soar lifts the lid on WTS UK’s ambitious recruitment plans, the firm's positioning against the big four, and why tax is the perfect profession for AI
The move reinforces Milan’s role as a key European hub for international business, the firm said
Australia’s government has also announced that it will implement the pillar two side-by-side agreement
Sara Morgan is due to join Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen as a partner in London, ITR understands
The newly combined tax team has already worked on thousands of joint client matters, leaders from McDermott Will & Schulte tell ITR
As AI becomes increasingly intuitive and idiot-proof, its tax applicability is becoming impossible to overstate
New data on public CbCR showed uneven adoption, as Singapore advanced pillar two compliance and firms expanded their tax capabilities
Gift this article