In two separate judgments Delhi High Court ruled on the tax liability of Rolls Royce and Rolls Royce Singapore due to their operations in India. Common issue in both the matters was exposure to a permanent establishment (PE) in India and quantum of profits to be attributed to operations carried out by the PE in India. Sunil Jain of J Sagar & Associates investigates.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
After joining Milbank from Akin Gump, the fund tax specialist discusses sponsor demand, practice building, and the tax challenges facing asset managers
New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows