This content is from: Home

Court springs PE debate back into life

In two separate judgments Delhi High Court ruled on the tax liability of Rolls Royce and Rolls Royce Singapore due to their operations in India. Common issue in both the matters was exposure to a permanent establishment (PE) in India and quantum of profits to be attributed to operations carried out by the PE in India. Sunil Jain of J Sagar & Associates investigates.

To access our market-driven intelligence please request a trial here.

Read this article – and more – for a 30 day period.


Are you already an ITR subscriber? Log in here

Instant access to all of our content. Membership Options | 30 Day Trial