Bulgaria: Bulgaria passes the First Offshore Companies Act

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bulgaria: Bulgaria passes the First Offshore Companies Act

pechilkova.jpg

Donka Pechilkova

The Bulgarian Parliament adopted a new law, which concerns offshore companies and their activity in the territory of Bulgaria. The decrees of the new Act on Economic and Financial Relations of Companies Registered in Jurisdictions with Low Tax Regime and their Real Owner started to be applied effectively from January 1 2014. According to the law, the partnership, direct or indirect, of companies that have been registered in jurisdictions with a privileged tax regime is forbidden in 28 key sectors of the Bulgarian economy. It means that entities established in countries where income or corporate tax rates are 60% lower than respective rates in Bulgaria are not allowed to participate in tenders for public procurements; privatisation transactions; concessionary competitions; deals, concerning municipal or government property. There are restrictions for sharing of offshore companies in procedures for obtaining of general credit institution licenses, such as insurance licenses, as well as licenses for gambling activity, healthy-insurance funds, mobile services providers. Also, entities registered in jurisdictions with low tax regimes and whose real owner is unknown cannot participate or act as a publisher of periodical press. Another sector, which is closed for offshore companies, is the area of social agencies that are preparing and sharing public sociological analysis.

It is important to note that the above restrictions are not applicable under certain circumstances. In case the offshore companies participate in a company whose shares are brokered to a regular market in an EU or EEA member state. Another option is if the mother company or a daughter company of the offshore entity is a Bulgarian local resident and its shareholders-Bulgarian physical persons are known. The law even goes further and allows the participation of offshore companies in entities that are publishers of periodical press, in case they submit by official procedure information regarding their real owners. It is a very sensitive issue, as one of the main reasons for preparing and passing of such a law is the fact that for more than 20 years in Bulgaria plenty of entities that have unknown shareholders have been operating, forming about 20% of foreign investments in Bulgaria.

This new Act is coming at a time, when Bulgarian society needs tangible actions from the government to show yearning for fighting against the grey economy in the country and guarantee long-term prosperity of Bulgaria.

Donka Pechilkova (donka.pechilkova@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Sofia Office

Tel.: +359 2 988 69 78

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article