Albania: VAT deferral for machinery and equipment imports in Albania

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Albania: VAT deferral for machinery and equipment imports in Albania

lena.jpg

Erion Lena

The Law no. 7928, dated April 27 1995 'On Value Added Tax', as amended, implemented a scheme of deferral and exemption from the payment of VAT. Based on paragraph 2.1 of article 26 of the Law no. 7928, for machinery and equipment imported by taxable persons, which is directly related to their economic activity, the scheme of postponing the payment of VAT for a period of up to 12 months applies, under which VAT is not payable to the Customs authorities at the time of import.

This scheme of VAT deferred payment applies to machinery and equipment imported by the taxable persons who are registered as taxpayers for VAT. The condition is that imports carried out are related to the economic activity of the taxable person, and that such economic activity depends on the particular machinery and equipment.

The taxable person benefiting from this scheme is liable to present to the Customs authority the documentation required, based on the tax legislation.

The taxable value of machinery and equipment imported also includes:

a) costs of transport and insurance and other costs involved in the importation of machinery and equipment, up to the moment of entry in Albania; and

b) fees, taxes and duties payable as a result of the export of machinery and equipment from countries from which they are exported, or payable as a result of their import, except the VAT amount.

The Customs authority, after determining the value of taxable machinery and equipment, with all its constituent elements, applies to this value the VAT rate, which is in force at the time of importation of machinery and equipment.

VAT calculated by the Customs authority is not paid by the taxable person at the time of clearance of imported machinery and equipment; rather it is paid within 12 months from the time of importation of machinery and equipment.

In cases where the investment development cycle, the start of production or the start of the delivery service is longer than 12 months, the Minister of Finance has the authority to extend the period for deferral VAT payment, depending on the investment development cycle defined by the relevant agreement or contract.

Erion Lena (erion.lena@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Tirana Office

Tel: +355 69 533 7456

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Originators, loan purchasers and securitisation vehicles may need to revisit servicing agreements and pricing after a key judgment narrowed the VAT credit management exemption
Opening doors for existing talent within Baker McKenzie and a desire for enhanced legal capabilities informed Ricardo Perera’s switch from KPMG
Boaz Goren’s move to the upstart PE-backed firm takes the number of senior UK tax professionals who have left EY this year to 13
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms
Gift this article