Canada: Canada’s 2014 budget eliminates tax benefits of immigration trusts

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Canada’s 2014 budget eliminates tax benefits of immigration trusts

leopardi.jpg

carbone.jpg

John Leopardi


Alexandra Carbone

The government announced in Canada's 2014 budget that it would be introducing new measures to further prevent the use of non-resident trusts to avoid Canadian income tax, notably the proposed elimination of the Canadian tax benefits of immigration trusts. Where a Canadian resident contributes property to a non-resident trust, the trust may be deemed to be a resident of Canada for Canadian tax purposes. Before the budget, an exemption from the deemed-resident trust rule was available where the contributor was an individual who had resided in Canada for a total period of not more than 60 months; non-resident trusts which fell within this exemption were referred to as immigration trusts. Where a trust qualified for the 60-month exemption, it would not be subject to Canadian tax on its foreign-source income for the relevant period. Whereas individuals resident in Canada are normally subject to tax on their worldwide income, the 60-month exemption essentially allowed individuals immigrating to Canada to shelter their foreign source investment income from Canadian tax for up to five years by establishing a non-resident trust and transferring their income-producing assets to the trust prior.

As a result of the 60-month tax exemption, Canadian resident beneficiaries of immigration trusts indirectly obtained a tax benefit that was not available to other Canadian residents not earning income through immigration trusts. The Canadian government stated in the budget, "the 60-month exemption raises tax fairness, tax integrity and tax neutrality concerns".

The proposal amends the non-resident trust rules to remove the 60-month exemption for immigration trusts, generally for taxation years ending on or after February 11 2014. Consequently, an immigration trust will be deemed resident in Canada and subject to taxation on its worldwide income starting in 2015. Limited relief phase-in rules apply in particular circumstances. Individuals who immigrated to Canada and established an immigration trust arrangement should revisit their tax planning in light of the proposed measures.

John Leopardi (john.leopardi@blakes.com)

Tel: +1 514 982 5030; +1 514 982 5030
Alexandra Carbone (alexandra.carbone@blakes.com)

Tel: +1 514 982 5034

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The case sits within a context of Brazil signalling that it is replacing informal discretion and ambiguity with structures that reward analytical rigour, one expert tells ITR
Jeff Soar lifts the lid on WTS UK’s ambitious recruitment plans, the firm's positioning against the big four, and why tax is the perfect profession for AI
The move reinforces Milan’s role as a key European hub for international business, the firm said
Australia’s government has also announced that it will implement the pillar two side-by-side agreement
Sara Morgan is due to join Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen as a partner in London, ITR understands
The newly combined tax team has already worked on thousands of joint client matters, leaders from McDermott Will & Schulte tell ITR
As AI becomes increasingly intuitive and idiot-proof, its tax applicability is becoming impossible to overstate
New data on public CbCR showed uneven adoption, as Singapore advanced pillar two compliance and firms expanded their tax capabilities
Nearly two years after its publication, the Corporate Tax Roadmap is reshaping the UK’s TP framework through incremental reforms focused on scope, transparency and earlier HMRC intervention
With a stark divergence between MNEs that prepared early and those rushing to catch up, advisers must remain agile with all manner of compliance risks
Gift this article