Canada: Canada’s 2014 budget eliminates tax benefits of immigration trusts
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Canada’s 2014 budget eliminates tax benefits of immigration trusts

leopardi.jpg

carbone.jpg

John Leopardi


Alexandra Carbone

The government announced in Canada's 2014 budget that it would be introducing new measures to further prevent the use of non-resident trusts to avoid Canadian income tax, notably the proposed elimination of the Canadian tax benefits of immigration trusts. Where a Canadian resident contributes property to a non-resident trust, the trust may be deemed to be a resident of Canada for Canadian tax purposes. Before the budget, an exemption from the deemed-resident trust rule was available where the contributor was an individual who had resided in Canada for a total period of not more than 60 months; non-resident trusts which fell within this exemption were referred to as immigration trusts. Where a trust qualified for the 60-month exemption, it would not be subject to Canadian tax on its foreign-source income for the relevant period. Whereas individuals resident in Canada are normally subject to tax on their worldwide income, the 60-month exemption essentially allowed individuals immigrating to Canada to shelter their foreign source investment income from Canadian tax for up to five years by establishing a non-resident trust and transferring their income-producing assets to the trust prior.

As a result of the 60-month tax exemption, Canadian resident beneficiaries of immigration trusts indirectly obtained a tax benefit that was not available to other Canadian residents not earning income through immigration trusts. The Canadian government stated in the budget, "the 60-month exemption raises tax fairness, tax integrity and tax neutrality concerns".

The proposal amends the non-resident trust rules to remove the 60-month exemption for immigration trusts, generally for taxation years ending on or after February 11 2014. Consequently, an immigration trust will be deemed resident in Canada and subject to taxation on its worldwide income starting in 2015. Limited relief phase-in rules apply in particular circumstances. Individuals who immigrated to Canada and established an immigration trust arrangement should revisit their tax planning in light of the proposed measures.

John Leopardi (john.leopardi@blakes.com)

Tel: +1 514 982 5030; +1 514 982 5030
Alexandra Carbone (alexandra.carbone@blakes.com)

Tel: +1 514 982 5034

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Despite the relief, Brazil’s government has also presented a bill which seeks to re-impose a tax burden on companies’ payroll, one local tax specialist told ITR
Jeremy Brown arrives at the firm after a near 16-year career with Deloitte
PwC could elect a woman into the senior leadership position for the first time; in other news, KPMG Australia has extended its CEO’s term
The Senate report into PwC’s scandal is titled ‘The cover up worsens the crime’
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
The firm’s tax business generated a quarter of HLB’s overall revenues in 2023
While successful pillar two implementation will require collaboration across all units, a combination of internal and external tax advice is at the centre of the effort
Binance has also been accused of manipulating foreign exchange rates via currency speculation and rate-fixing
Six individuals should have raised questions over information they received but did not breach professional standards, according to the firm
The partnership of KPMG UK has installed Holt for a second term as CEO and senior partner; in other news, a Baker McKenzie partner has sued the IRS
Gift this article