This content is from: United States

Inversions - special focus

Between 1983 and 2004 there were 29 inversion transactions out of the US. In the decade following, almost 50 companies restructured using the method. With foreign profits trapped offshore by an outdated, worldwide system which would hit them with a tax on repatriation, as well as a high tax rate, the temptation to consider an inversion is proving too much for US companies, particularly those in the highly-mobile pharmaceuticals sector. Whatever the motivation, inversions are in vogue. ITR’s special report looks at the knock-on impacts of the current wave of inversions, including shareholder pressure to consider an option they see their rivals pursuing and the possible inflammation of the tax morality debate in the US. We also bring you exclusive insight as to why Danaher is not looking to invert.

Download the special report as a PDF

The past month has seen a growing number of US politicians and legislators crying foul at the practice of inverting. President Obama has described inverters as “fleeing the country to get out of paying taxes”, while Jacob Lew, US Treasury Secretary, has called for a greater sense of “economic patriotism”. Democrats are more adamant about curbing the restructuring technique immediately, while Republicans, for the most part, want to see action under the umbrella of comprehensive tax reform. Sander Levin, his brother Carl, and Ron Wyden, Senate Finance Committee chairman, are among those to have proposed specific anti-inversion legislation, including legislation that would have retrospective effect to May 8 2014. Efforts to reform the US tax code indicate the crawling pace of change on Capitol Hill, but there is no denying there is a narrowing window of opportunity for taxpayers already looking at restructuring, or considering a merger or acquisition, to think about inverting.

Check out our infographic on page 5 to see how pharmaceuticals companies are leading the inversions charge, and review our insights as to which company in the sector could be next to invert.

Engage in the debate on social media: you can join our Facebook or LinkedIn group to share insights with fellow professionals, or tweet @Intltaxreview using #inversionsITR

TwitterTweet this          Twitter#inversionsITR          LinkedInLinkedIn group


Inversions trend continues to cause controversy

July 18 2014

Companies under pressure to consider inverting

July 4 2014

Why Danaher Corporation is not looking to invert

July 18 2014

Download this special report as a PDF

Further reading

The material on this site is for financial institutions, professional investors and their professional advisers. It is for information only. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.

© 2021 Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC. For help please see our FAQ.

Instant access to all of our content. Membership Options | 30 Day Trial