|Alvaro de la Cueva|
However this mechanism, which aims to eliminate the double taxation that would arise if the income was first taxed at the investee and then on the occasion of the gain, is not reflected in the non-residents income tax.
Against this backdrop, the Spanish Supreme Court recently published its judgment of October 25 2013 on a French entity's claim that it was entitled to a refund from the Spanish tax authorities on the grounds that, as the Spanish tax legislation on non-residents did not establish a mechanism to avoid double taxation such as that noted above, the tax that the French entity had to pay on the gain that it realised on a transfer of a holding in a Spanish entity infringed the free movement of capital between member states, and was therefore in breach of EU law which prohibits discrimination on grounds of nationality and, by extension, on grounds of residence.
In addressing the claim, the Supreme Court, referring to the extensive case law of the European Court of Justice on the prevalence of Community Law and its direct applicability when it comes to preventing discriminatory situations, acknowledged the French entity's right to take the tax credit, thus reducing the tax due, and consequently its right to obtain a refund of the non-resident income tax that it had overpaid.
In light of the above, although the applicability of this judgment is restricted to certain cases (essentially because of the Spanish non-resident tax legislation, which establishes an exemption for gains realised on the sale of holdings in Spanish entities that are not real estate entities or of holdings that did not reach 25% in the preceding year, and by application of the tax treaties which, with certain significant exceptions such as France or Portugal, among others, reserve the taxation of these gains to the state of residence of the sellers), taxpayers would do well to analyse the transfers they have made in the past four years.
Alvaro de la Cueva (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Tel: +34 915 145 200