Chile: Final approval for Chilean tax reform package expected next month
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Final approval for Chilean tax reform package expected next month

benedetto.jpg

maria.jpg

Sandra Benedetto


Maria del Mar Sanchez

As mentioned in previous updates, a substantial tax reform is in the process of being approved in Chile. Though the legislative procedure started on April 1 2014, it is not until now that it has arrived to what may be its last stage. On September 10 2014, the Chamber of Representatives approved the Bill and sent the relevant text to the President for consideration. Since it is unlikely that further amendments will be introduced by the President, the law approving the Bill is expected to be released in late September or in the beginning of October. The following items cover some of the major amendments potentially affecting either foreign investors or local taxpayers investing abroad:

Two optional income tax regimes are introduced: Regime A and Regime B. In general, Regime A entails shareholders being annually attributed the income generated by the local entity and taxed on such. Hence, the whole taxation arising in Chile for both the shareholder and the relevant entity is triggered each year, even if no effective dividend distribution is performed by the latter. Under this scenario, the 35% tax burden currently borne by foreign investors is maintained, but there is no chance to defer the shareholders' taxation.

On the contrary, Regime B generally maintains the existing integrated mechanism, where the local entity is annually taxed but the shareholder's taxation is deferred until an effective dividend distribution occurs, where it will be granted a credit consisting of the first category tax paid at the corporate level by the Chilean entity. However, Regime B restricts such credit so that the current 35% tax burden increases to 44.45%; save for the case of foreign investors resident in a country which has a double tax convention in force with Chile, where no credit restriction applies and the mentioned 35% total tax burden is still maintained.

The corporate tax rate is gradually increased from 20% to 25% or 27%, depending on whether the taxpayer opts for Regime A or Regime B, respectively, as follows: (i) 21% in 2014, 22.5% in 2015, 24% in 2016, 25% in 2017 onwards, under Regime A, and (ii) 21% in 2014, 22.5% in 2015, 24% in 2016, 25.5% in 2017 and 27% in 2018, under Regime B.

Controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules are introduced, where, as a general rule, passive income of foreign entities qualifying as CFC shall be taxed in Chile.

A general-anti avoidance rule (GAAR) is incorporated, by which tax obligations shall arise considering the legal nature of the acts actually carried on, whatever form or name is given by the parties; this follows a judicial procedure carried out at the IRS director's request before the Customs and Tax Court. Besides, any person who designs or plans transactions herein covered, or directors or legal representatives of a legal entity infringing this rule, may be sanctioned.

Thin capitalisation rules (3:1 debt-to-equity ratio) are modified, basically in the manner in which the excess of indebtedness is calculated.

A one-time repatriation procedure is envisaged, where taxpayers who have not paid the due Chilean taxes on assets or income located abroad may pay a flat 8% over the value of such assets and income, provided that several requirements are met.

Since the amendments foresee diverse entries into force and some of them will not apply until years 2016 or 2017, taxpayers will now face the challenge of determining the effect these new provisions have in their particular situations and, should the case be, these will likely need to define the proper way for minimizing the actual impact of the above stated.

Sandra Benedetto (sandra.benedetto@cl.pwc.com) and Maria del Mar Sanchez (maria.del.mar.sanchez@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +56 22 94 00 155

Website: www.pwc.cl

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Despite the relief, Brazil’s government has also presented a bill which seeks to re-impose a tax burden on companies’ payroll, one local tax specialist told ITR
Jeremy Brown arrives at the firm after a near 16-year career with Deloitte
PwC could elect a woman into the senior leadership position for the first time; in other news, KPMG Australia has extended its CEO’s term
The Senate report into PwC’s scandal is titled ‘The cover up worsens the crime’
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
The firm’s tax business generated a quarter of HLB’s overall revenues in 2023
While successful pillar two implementation will require collaboration across all units, a combination of internal and external tax advice is at the centre of the effort
Binance has also been accused of manipulating foreign exchange rates via currency speculation and rate-fixing
Six individuals should have raised questions over information they received but did not breach professional standards, according to the firm
The partnership of KPMG UK has installed Holt for a second term as CEO and senior partner; in other news, a Baker McKenzie partner has sued the IRS
Gift this article