Switzerland: Spontaneous exchange of tax rulings

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Spontaneous exchange of tax rulings

schreiber.jpg

parmentier.jpg

René Schreiber


Veronique Parmentier

Could multinationals, in the future, see their Swiss tax rulings sent to foreign jurisdictions by the Swiss authorities? In 2013 Switzerland signed the Convention on Multilateral Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (the Convention), which provides for spontaneous exchange of information. In January 2015 the Swiss Federal Council initiated a decree allowing ratification of the Convention and the amendment of the Swiss law on administrative assistance to introduce spontaneous exchange of information into domestic law. A draft decree was submitted to the parliament in June 2015 and first exchanges of information are expected as from January 1 2018. The question remains as to whether these exchanges will also include Swiss advanced tax rulings.

Article 7, paragraph 1 of the Convention lists the cases in which a jurisdiction should spontaneously transmit information to another jurisdiction. The OECD Manual on the implementation of exchange of information for tax purposes provides additional guidance regarding such circumstances. However, none of these documents refer explicitly to tax rulings.

The Swiss Federal Council will issue a decree providing more details regarding the obligations resulting from the Convention, and the tax authorities will issue some practical directives that will take into account the practice in other jurisdictions as well as international standards. Based on the current parliamentary work, this includes the framework being developed by the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices under the BEPS umbrella for the spontaneous exchange of tax rulings.

Therefore, it has to be expected that any tax ruling relating to a cross-border transaction involving movable income, which benefits from a preferential regime and a low effective rate of taxation, would fall under the scope of the new spontaneous exchange of information. It is, at this stage, less clear for other tax rulings. Many current tax rulings including the taxation of mixed companies, holding companies or principal structures will most likely fall into the first category.

René Schreiber (rschreiber@deloitte.ch) and Veronique Parmentier (vparmentier@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 7216 and +41 58 279 7856

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Gift this article