Malta: Amendment to the highly qualified persons rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malta: Amendment to the highly qualified persons rules

vella.jpg

galea-salomone.jpg

Donald Vella


Mark Galea Salamone

The Maltese Parliament has recently passed Legal Notice 225 of 2015, amending the highly qualified persons (HQP) rules as promulgated in 2010. A qualifying EU, EEA or Swiss beneficiary who, before the recent amendment could benefit under the rules for a maximum qualifying period of five years, may now benefit for an additional period of five years. Beneficiaries, therefore, now have the possibility of benefitting from the rules for an extended period of up to 10 years. The rules aim to attract HQPs to occupy an eligible position with companies licensed and/or recognised by the Malta Financial Services Authority, companies licensed by the Malta Gaming Authority, and undertakings holding an Air Operators' Certificate or an Aerodrome Licence issued by the Authority for Transport in Malta. Examples of eligible roles include: chief executive; financial, commercial or investment officer; head of investor relations, marketing or research and development; and senior analyst or trader, among others.

Under these rules, income from a qualifying contract of employment received by a beneficiary is subject to tax at a flat rate of 15% provided that the income amounts to a minimum of €75,000 ($84,000). The Inland Revenue's tax guidelines on the rules provide that the minimum income for basis year 2015 must exceed €81,457. The 15% tax rate applies up to a maximum income of €5,000,000. One of the advantages of the rules is that any income over and above the latter threshold is exempt from tax. As mentioned above, this tax rate originally applied for a consecutive period of five years for EU/EEA/Swiss nationals, and a consecutive period of four years for third country nationals.

However, through LN 25/2015, EU/EEA or Swiss beneficiaries may now apply for a one-time extension of five years to his qualifying period, as long as the individual has not been residing in Malta prior to the January 1 2008.

There are a number of criteria that must be satisfied before a taxpayer can benefit under the rules. The applicant must:

  • be an individual in receipt of income subject to tax under a qualifying contract of employment received in respect of work carried out in Malta which is fully disclosed for tax purposes;

  • have an employment contract subject to the laws of Malta and prove – to the satisfaction of the relevant authority under which the company employing the said beneficiary is licensed – that the contract is drawn up for exercising genuine and effective work in Malta and that he has the required competence to do so;

  • prove to the satisfaction of the relevant authority that they are in possession of qualifications relevant to the profession attested by evidence of education qualifications or by at least five years' professional experience of a level comparable to educational qualifications;

  • not have benefitted under the investment services and insurance expatriates provisions as detailed in the Income Tax Act;

  • prove to the satisfaction of the relevant authority that they perform activities of an eligible office; and

  • prove to the satisfaction of the relevant authority that:

they are in receipt of stable and regular resources which are sufficient for his maintenance and that of his family without recourse to social security in Malta; they reside in accommodation regarded as normal for a comparable family in Malta and which meets the general health and safety standards in force in Malta; they are in possession of a valid travel document; they are in possession of sickness insurance for themselves and their family for all risks across the whole of the EU normally covered for Maltese nationals; and they are not domiciled in Malta.

An otherwise qualified individual will not benefit from the special tax rate under this scheme if the income is received from an employer who receives any benefits under business incentive laws or is paid by a person who is related (as defined in the rules) to the employer who received any benefits under any business incentive laws. A third country national who physically stays in Malta for more than 1,460 days in the aggregate, or acquires real rights over immovable property situated in Malta or holds a beneficial interest over such rights, will suffer from a claw-back of the benefits availed of under the rules.

The rules now provide that no determination under the rules will be issued after December 31 2020 and any determination issued must refer to employment commencing by December 31 2021 and terminated by December 31 2025. This is a welcome amendment, in line with Malta's firm commitment to continue attracting highly qualified persons to Malta.

Donald Vella (donald.vella@camilleripreziosi.com) and Mark Galea Salamone (mark.galeasalomone@camilleripreziosi.com)

Camilleri Preziosi

Tel: +356 2123 8989

Website: www.camilleripreziosi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

However, women in tax face greater career obstacles than their male counterparts, an exclusive ITR survey of more than 100 women tax leaders revealed
Under Jeff Soar’s leadership, WTS UK aims to scale to 100 partners within five years and challenge the big four
As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
Gift this article