This content is from: Germany

Germany: German Federal Tax Court rules disallowance of write-down for related-party debt violates OECD model treaty

Linn-Alexander-100Braun-Thorsten-100
Alexander LinnThorsten Braun

The German Federal Tax Court (Bundesfinanzhof, BFH) issued a decision (case ref. I R 29/14) on September 9 2015, in which it held that the domestic transfer pricing rules may not be applied to disallow a write-down of an impaired related-party debt in a case where a relevant tax treaty includes the arm's-length standard provisions of Article 9 of the OECD model treaty.

Until 2007, German multinationals could claim a deduction for bad debts on loans granted to subsidiaries if the subsidiary did not perform as planned and the debt was impaired. As from 2008, write-downs of related-party loans are non-deductible under specific rules in the German Corporate Tax Act, unless it can be demonstrated that the loan was granted in line with (a very narrow interpretation of) the arm's-length principle.

In an effort to extend the general presumption of non-deductibility to the years before 2008, the German tax authorities challenged a 2002 write-down of a substantial unsecured debt owed by an undercapitalised UK subsidiary of a German entity of a Canadian group. The tax authorities argued that the German transfer pricing rules disallowed the write-down because either the loan was not granted on arm's-length terms, or the loan was not impaired because the subsidiary still could rely on the financial backing from its group, as long as it paid its third-party lenders.

The BFH confirmed a previous decision (case ref. I R 23/13) and emphasised that it may be in line with the arm's-length principle not to require collateral from a group subsidiary when granting a loan, and that it still may be possible to consider such a debt to be impaired if the subsidiary experiences financial difficulties. The BFH also confirmed that, where a tax treaty includes Article 9, paragraph 1 of the OECD model (as is the case with most German tax treaties), the domestic transfer pricing provisions may not disallow the write-down, since Article 9 permits only income adjustments relating to the conditions of the loan (for example, the interest rate); it does not permit the disallowance of a write-down. It is unclear if the same reasoning may be applied to years from 2008, where the deduction for a write-down is generally disallowed for reasons unrelated to the transfer pricing framework.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)
Deloitte
Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444
Website: www.deloitte.de

The material on this site is for financial institutions, professional investors and their professional advisers. It is for information only. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.

© 2019 Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC. For help please see our FAQ.

Instant access to all of our content. Membership Options | One Week Trial

Related