Switzerland: Many more foreign-domiciled suppliers VAT liable from January 1 2015

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Many more foreign-domiciled suppliers VAT liable from January 1 2015

suter.jpg

rodak.jpg

Benno Suter


Tomas Rodak

The Federal Ministers have concluded that pursuant to the new article 9a of the Swiss VAT Ordinance the general VAT exemption for foreign entities exclusively rendering services and goods that are subject to VAT reverse charge becomes limited to rendering of services only. Since installation, repair, maintenance and leasing, for example, qualify from a Swiss VAT perspective as a supply of goods, many foreign domiciled suppliers doing business in Switzerland have to thoroughly consider their obligation to register for VAT purposes in Switzerland if they generate annual turnover of more than CHF 100,000 with such supplies.

Although this new rule concerns predominantly small, non-Swiss resident craftsmen doing business in Switzerland and in the principality of Liechtenstein, multinational entities might also be affected. Since Switzerland applies a kind of VAT force of attraction, all rendered services of a foreign domiciled entity have to be taxed instead of applying the reverse charge obligation of the buyer once the supplying entity is Swiss VAT registered. No change is foreseen for foreign entities providing telecom or electronic services to Swiss or Liechtenstein resident customers (B2C). All foreign entities rendering such B2C services of more than CHF 100,000 a year must still be VAT registered in Switzerland. Furthermore, a revision of the Swiss VAT Law is on its way and is projected for January 1 2016. This revision defines the VAT registration threshold of CHF 100,000 no longer as Swiss but rather as global turnover that will oblige even more multinational entities to register for VAT purposes in Switzerland. The de-minimis rules for the importation of small goods are also under the scrutiny of the planned revision. If those de-minimis exemptions fall, even more foreign entities will have to register in Switzerland for VAT purposes from January 1 2016. Foreign domiciled entities with no domestic presence need to appoint a Swiss domiciled fiscal representative and have to consider their obligations as VAT payers.

Benno Suter (bsuter@deloitte.ch) and Tomas Rodak (trodak@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 63 66 and +41 58 279 63 64

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR understands that UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves will announce a consultation on the proposed financial reward scheme, which had left advisers fretting
The long-running dispute centres on Medtronic’s use of the comparable uncontrolled transaction TP method; in other news, Paul Hastings and FTI Consulting both made double tax hires
The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Gift this article