Germany: Tax amendments 2015 finalised

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Tax amendments 2015 finalised

endres.jpg

Dieter Endres

After a series of political disputes, the Bundesrat gave its approval to a watered down Bill to change various tax rules on the lines of a traditional tax amendment act. While the amendments are not drastic, the Bill covers the following.

Income Tax Act

An attempt to transpose the ECJ Beker and Beker judgment of December 18, 2013 (case C-168/11) into national law. The ECJ held the present method of calculating the maximum foreign tax credit to be unacceptable because it effectively reduces personal allowances in proportion to the tax-free foreign source income. The amendment does not completely achieve its object because of a drafting error. Further legislative action is to be expected.

The employee outing tax-free allowance of €110 per head has been retained, but now includes the venue costs as well as the costs of consumption. The main effect is to complicate the administrative burden on employers.

Foreign Tax Act

The profit correction provision has been amended to remove all foreign/domestic considerations from third-party comparisons. This follows from attempts to deny the validity of an unfavourable third-party comparison because one of the parties to it was a local resident.

VAT

Managing portfolio investments on behalf of customers is henceforth a taxable transaction in Germany when performed for a customer in a non-member state of the EU. This responds to an unsuccessful attempt to claim the contrary before the ECJ.

Other changes

In the same session the Bundesrat gave its approval to provisions for less generous treatment of tax evaders coming forward. The restriction follows from improved methods of detection.

Open issues

Proposals that have not been passed, but which remain on the agenda – for 2015 or later – include:

  • a prohibition of a business expense deduction for an outlay that has been or will be deducted abroad. This is primarily intended to counter hybrid financing schemes;

  • taxation of the capital gains of companies from the sale of portfolio shareholdings. This demand of the Bundesrat reflects that body's view of a capital gain as a direct substitute for a dividend;

  • an extension of the intra-group exemption from the loss forfeiture rules for share transfers between related parties; and

  • the abolition of tax-free share exchanges to the extent of a cash balancing payment.

Dieter Endres (dieter.endres@de.pwc.com)

PwC Frankfurt

Tel +49 69 9585 6232

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
Gift this article