Italy: Italy is reviewing the criteria to identify tax havens

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Italy is reviewing the criteria to identify tax havens

foglia.jpg

dayala.jpg

Giuliano Foglia


Giovanni d’Ayala Valva

The Italian government is pressing ahead with a plan to attract foreign capital and investment. The idea is to make the Italian environment more appealing to investors through measures aimed at promoting economic growth. More specifically, certain measures have been recently approved (for example, the voluntary disclosure programme, patent box regime, research and development tax credit) and others should be introduced in the future either as part of the Investment Compact Bill or in the context of the so called Fiscal Delegation Law (which will, inter alia, review the Italian abuse of law regime, the tax avoidance discipline and introduce the new tax compliance scheme).

In this context, on December 22 2014, the Italian parliament approved the 2015 Stability Law, which, among others, set forth new criteria to identify blacklist countries, in order to confront a recurrent issue for companies working with foreign suppliers.

Indeed, the Italian income tax code requires for Italian entities an additional burden of proof to allow the deduction of costs (expenses and other negative income) deriving from transactions incurred with entities (or professionals) resident or located in certain countries identified in the so called blacklist.

In such respect, 2015 Stability Law revised the criteria to identify blacklist countries introducing as guiding principle the level of exchange of information between the third state and Italy (irrespective of the effective level of taxation in the third state).

Consequently, a new decree of the Minister of Finance will be issued in the near future to amend the previous blacklist, with the aim to delist all the countries that now have an adequate exchange of information with Italy.

In practical terms, such provision will simplify the relationship between Italy and commercial operators previously located in blacklisted countries which have an exchange of information clause in their treaty with Italy, such as Ecuador, Mauritius, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea and United Arab Emirates. Hong Kong could also be removed from the blacklist once the relevant bilateral tax treaty is ratified by the Italian parliament.

The review of blacklist countries is consistent with the recent approach of the OECD to boost tax transparency and to promote automatic sharing of information between tax authorities. In this scenario, the Italian government is close to signing agreements with numerous blacklisted countries (for example, Switzerland) based on OECD standards which, on the one hand, will have the effect to intensify the exchange of data between tax authorities but, on the other hand, should also grant certain benefits for taxpayers in their relationship with the Italian tax authority.

Giuliano Foglia (foglia@virtax.it) and Giovanni d'Ayala Valva (dayala@virtax.it)

Tremonti Vitali Romagnoli Piccardi e Associati

Tel: +39 06 3218022 (Rome); +39 02 58313707 (Milan)

Website: www.virtax.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
The High Court’s dismissal of barrister Setu Kamal’s legal challenge represents the first successful strike-out under a new law on SLAPPs
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
Gift this article