South Africa: Tax law changes and tax compliance requirements

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: Tax law changes and tax compliance requirements

dachs.jpg

Peter Dachs

Limitation on interest deductions

With effect from January 1 2015 certain limitations will be imposed on the deduction of interest incurred, inter alia, by debtors in the following instances:

  • where the creditor is in a controlling relationship with such debtor; or

  • where there is no controlling relationship but where the creditor has obtained funding from a person in a controlling relationship with the debtor; and

  • where the interest incurred is not, inter alia, subject to South African tax in the hands of the person to which the interest accrues.

These limitations may impact on transactions where foreign funding is obtained by South African borrowers from non-resident lenders. A non-resident lender would not be subject to tax if it qualifies for the domestic interest exemption or treaty relief.

Tax compliance requirements

Government Notice No 506 published in Government Gazette No 37767 on June 25 2014 (GN 506) stipulates who is required to furnish returns for the 2014 year of assessment, inter alia:

  • Every person who is personally or in a representative capacity liable to taxation under the Income Tax Act; and

  • Every company, trust or other juristic person, which is a resident, or every company, trust or other juristic person, which is not a resident which either:

  • carried on a trade through a permanent establishment in South Africa, or

  • derived any capital gain from a South African source or which derived service income from a South African source;

  • Every non-resident whose gross income consisted of interest from a source in the Republic to which the provisions of section 10(1)(h) of the Income Tax Act, do not apply.

The issue arises whether the phrase "liable to taxation under the Act" includes a non-resident that earns South African sourced income but is entitled to full treaty relief from South African tax.

In terms of a SARS private binding ruling, the exemption in respect of treaties comes in after gross income. This supports the view that a non-resident which qualifies for treaty relief would not have "income" as defined and should therefore not be "liable to tax" and accordingly not be required to submit a tax return for the 2014 tax year. It should be noted that a private binding ruling only has a binding effect on SARS in respect of the applicant or co-applicant for the ruling and no third party may rely on any such ruling.

Peter Dachs (pdachs@ensafrica.com)

ENSafrica – Taxand Africa

Tel: +27 21 410 2500

Website: www.ensafrica.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article