Bulgaria: Double tax treaty between Bulgaria and Norway

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bulgaria: Double tax treaty between Bulgaria and Norway

varbanov.jpg

Petar Varbanov

On July 8 2015, the Bulgarian Parliament ratified the convention for the avoidance of double taxation concluded with the Kingdom of Norway. The convention will apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the contracting states and to any substantially similar taxes that are imposed after the date of signature of the convention in addition to, or in place of, the existing taxes. The existing taxes to which the convention will apply are taxes on income, municipal tax on income, tax relating to submarine petroleum income, pipeline transport of petroleum, national tax on remuneration to non-resident artistes, corporate income tax and patent tax.

Taxation of income

Income derived by a resident of a contracting state from immovable property (including income from agriculture or forestry) situated in the other contracting state may be taxed in that other state. Also, business profits of an enterprise of a contracting state will be taxable only in that state unless the enterprise carries on business in the other contracting state through a permanent establishment (PE) situated therein. Profits of an enterprise of a contracting state from the operation of ships, aircraft, and railway or road transport vehicles in international transport shall be taxable only in that state.

Withholding taxes

According to the convention, dividends shall be taxed with 5% of the gross amount of the dividends if the beneficial owner is a company (other than a partnership) which holds directly at least 10% of the capital of the company paying the dividends. A tax rate of 15% of the gross amount of the dividends will be applicable in all other cases. Interest arising in a contracting state and paid to a resident of the other contracting state may be taxed in that other state. Such interest may also be taxed in the state in which it arises and according to the laws of that state, but if the beneficial owner of the interest is a resident of the other state, the tax charged will not exceed 5%. Royalty withholding tax charges will not exceed 5% of the gross amount of the royalties paid.

The convention will enter into force on the date of a ratification notification by Norway, which is now pending.

Petar Varbanov (petar.varbanov@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast

Tel: +359 2 988 69 75

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article