Australia: Hockey announces 2015-2016 Budget

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Hockey announces 2015-2016 Budget

mccormack.jpg

Jock McCormack

The Australian Government released a measured but significant 2015-2016 Federal Budget on May 12 2015. The three main tax changes include a focus on multinational tax avoidance by introducing new targeted non-resident anti-avoidance measures and penalties, changing the goods and services tax (GST) to apply to intangible supplies made by non-residents (including digital content) and tax concessions for small businesses. The Budget continues the Australian Government's focus on certain foreign-based multinationals, after the Australian Senate's inquiry focussed on the Australian tax positions of leading global e-commerce companies.

As a significant integrity measure to protect Australia's revenue base, draft legislation has been released outlining anti-avoidance rules combatting multinational tax avoidance.

Under the proposed section 177DA of Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, tax benefits will be cancelled in respect of schemes that satisfy all of the following requirements:

Under, or in connection with, the scheme

  • goods or services are provided by a non-resident to an Australian resident who is not an associate of the non-resident;

  • income derived by the non-resident from the supply is not attributable to an Australian permanent establishment (PE);

  • activities are undertaken in Australia by an Australian resident, or through an Australian PE of an associate of the non-resident or who is commercially dependent on the non-resident, in connection with the supply;

Scheme designed to avoid PE income

  • it would be reasonable to conclude that the scheme is designed to avoid the non-resident deriving income attributable to an Australian PE;

Double principal purpose test

  • a person or persons who entered into or carried out the scheme did so for a principal (as opposed to a sole or dominant) purpose of enabling a taxpayer to obtain an Australian tax benefit (that is, an Australian income tax saving) and to reduce foreign taxes or secure a saving from other Australian taxes (for example, GST);

Global revenue threshold

  • annual global revenue of the non-resident in the relevant income year exceeds $1 billion; and

No or low corporate tax jurisdiction

  • the non-resident is connected with a no or low corporate tax jurisdiction.

Other measures to tighten the rules for multinationals include adopting stronger penalties for groups that enter into tax avoidance measures related to profit shifting, and applying new transfer pricing documentation standards from January 1 2016.

The Budget confirms the GST rules are to be extended to the importations of digital products and services. This so called 'Netflix' tax is designed to ensure that non-resident suppliers of such content pay GST, thereby levelling the playing field for Australian suppliers already subject to GST. This measure is consistent with the OECD's guidelines on this subject, but under Australia's laws will require the approval of all states and territories to be enacted.

Jock McCormack (jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com)

DLA Piper

Tel: +61 2 9286 8253

Website: www.dlapiper.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article