Brazil: Computer software included in the concept of copyrights for the purposes of the double tax convention between Brazil and Finland

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Computer software included in the concept of copyrights for the purposes of the double tax convention between Brazil and Finland

chin.jpg
gottberg.jpg

Michela Chin

Ruben Gottberg

The Brazilian Federal Revenue (RFB) has issued tax ruling COSIT n. 4/2016, allowing the application of a 10% withholding tax (WHT) rate on payments for the use of computer software as provided by the double tax treaty (DTT) between Brazil and Finland.

By way of background, under the DTTs Brazil has in place with both Finland and France, taxation on royalties at source is limited as follows:

  • 10% on the royalties which refer to copyright;

  • 25% on royalties which refer to industry and commercial trademark use; and

  • 15% on royalties that do not qualify as either (a) or (b).

Although the provisions contained in both DTTs are similar, the RFB has expressed different positions in the past. Under tax ruling n. 52/2007, the RFB determined that payments for the use of computer software were subject to 15% WHT (as provided by the DTT between Brazil and Finland) whereas under tax ruling n. 262/2003, the position was that such payments were subject to 10% WHT (as provided by the DTT between Brazil and France).

Now, tax ruling COSIT n. 4/2016, issued on May 13 2016, solves the divergence by clarifying that licenses for computer software should be included in the concept of copyright licenses and that a 10% WHT rate should apply on payments for the use of computer software under the DTT between Brazil and Finland.

Brazilian tax authorities release a public consultation on the understanding of significant economic activities

The Brazilian tax authorities (RFB) have released Public Consultation n. 007/2016 expressing their initial understanding on what should be viewed as "significant economic activities" for the purpose of article 2 of Normative Instruction n. 1,037/2010.

The Normative Instruction provides a list of low-tax and privileged tax regime jurisdictions from a Brazilian tax perspective.

As per the content of the Consultation, released on May 30 2016, holding companies with significant economic activity should be those having, in its domicile, operational capacity to manage the group. That is, the holding company should have the ability to decide how to manage its assets and investments. Operational capacity should be tested by the existence of a fixed place (i.e. physical place of business) as well as having qualified employees to effectively manage the group.

According to the consultation, Brazilian taxpayers had until June 10 2016 to provide comments on this subject before the enactment of the Normative Instruction by the RFB.

Multinationals are encouraged to monitor the progress of this consultation and to analyse how this will impact their specific structures.

Michela Chin (michela.chin@br.pwc.com) and Ruben Gottberg (ruben.gottberg@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Website: www.pwc.com.br

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
As multinationals embed tax technology into their TP functions, a new breed of systems – built on multi-model databases – is quietly transforming intercompany pricing logic
Gift this article