Australia: Australian Budget increases heat on cross-border taxpayers and transactions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Australian Budget increases heat on cross-border taxpayers and transactions

McCormack

Jock McCormack

The Australian Government continued attacking multinational tax avoidance with its 2016-2017 Federal Budget released on May 3 2016. The announced measures include a 40% diverted profits tax on large multinationals from July 1 2017, akin to the UK diverted profits tax.

Other related measures announced included:

  • Anti-hybrid rules to limit the use of hybrid entities or instruments under two or more tax jurisdictions;

  • Further alignment of Australia's transfer pricing (TP) rules with international / OECD best practice;

  • A new tax avoidance taskforce, with 390 new specialist officers;

  • Enhanced protections for whistleblowers who advise the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) of tax misconduct;

  • Increased administrative penalties for significant global entities with global revenues of A$1 billion ($728 million) or more.

MAAL and other developments

These measures complement the existing Multinational Anti-Avoidance Law (MAAL) dealing with notional permanent establishment status, and the comprehensive tax transparency and reporting regimes, including the recently enacted country by country reporting requirements.

The corporate tax rate will be progressively reduced for small businesses with annual turnover of less than A$10 million, initially to 27.5% from July 1 2016, and ultimately for all companies by 2023 -2024. A target has also been set to reduce the corporate tax rate to 25% over 10 years.

Importantly, the government will introduce two new types of collective investment vehicles (CIVs): A corporate CIV from July 1 2017 and a limited partnership CIV from July 1 2018. Generally, these CIVs will be flow-through entities for tax purposes provided they are widely held and engage primarily in passive investment.

On GST (VAT), the Government announced:

  • The GST Act will be amended to better deal with digital currency (that is, Bitcoin);

  • GST will be imposed on low value imported goods (value less than A$1,000) from July 1 2017;

  • Compliance costs for entities with a turnover less than A$10 million will be reduced.

The Government also tightened various superannuation concessions.

Diverted profits tax (DPT)

Broadly, the DPT applies to large multinationals where:

  • They shift profits offshore through related-party arrangements; and

  • As a result, the bill on the profit shifted is less than 80% of the tax that would otherwise have been paid in Australia; and

  • It is reasonable to conclude that the arrangement is designed to secure a tax reduction and lacks economic substance.

For income years commencing on or after July 1 2017, the DPT (if applicable) will impose a penalty tax rate of 40% on profits transferred offshore.

Anti-hybrid mismatch rules

Australia will implement the OECD's measures to eliminate hybrid mismatch arrangements. The rules start January 1 2018, or six months after Royal Assent of the enabling legislation.

The measure targets arrangements exploiting differences in the tax treatment of instruments or entities in different countries to achieve double non-taxation and/or long term deferral of taxation. Redeemable preference shares are a common example of a hybrid instrument in Australia.

Tax avoidance taskforce

A new tax avoidance taskforce will focus on compliance with, and enforcement of, the various multinational tax avoidance measures above and the Multinational Anti-Avoidance Law (MAAL). Large multinationals should expect increased ATO audit activities on these measures.

Strengthening TP rules

The Government intends to strengthen Australia's TP rules and to ensure the rules are consistent with international best practice by focusing on substance over form. The Government announced that the OECD paper entitled "Aligning Transfer Pricing Outcomes with Value Creation" issued in October 2015 would be given the same guidance status as the OECD's 2010 guidelines within our TP rules.

Better protection for tax whistleblowers

New arrangements will apply from July 1 2018 to give better legal protection to individuals who disclose information to the ATO on tax avoidance behaviour. No further detail has been released, but the protection will likely apply to employees, former employees and advisers.

Jock McCormack (jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com)

DLA Piper Australia

Tel: +61 2 9286 8253

Fax: +61 2 9286 8007

Website: www.dlapiper.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Von Wobeser y Sierra’s head of tax shares best practices for resolving tax controversy and touts his firm’s founding partner as an exemplar of legal practice
ITR concludes its analysis of World Tax’s rankings for 2026 by highlighting the firms that stood out most on a global scale
Experts from law firm Kennedys outline the key tax disputes trends set to define 2026, ranging from increased enforcement to continued tariff drama and AI usage
They also warned against an ‘unnecessary duplication of efforts’ in UN tax convention negotiations; in other news, White & Case has hired Freshfields’ former French tax head
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by 16 February 2026
Defending loss situations in TP is not about denying the existence of losses but about showing, through proactive measures, that the losses reflect genuine commercial realities
Further empowerment of HMRC enforcement has been praised, but the pre-Budget OBR leak was described as ‘shambolic’
Michel Braun of WTS Digital reviews ITR’s inaugural AI in tax event, and concludes that AI will enhance, not replace, the tax professional
The report is solid and balanced as it correctly underscores the ambitious institutional redesign that Brazil has undertaken in adopting a dual VAT model, experts tell ITR
The Brazilian law firm partner warns against going independent too early, considers the weight of political pressure, and tells ITR what makes tax cool
Gift this article