Switzerland: Swiss House of Representatives makes the CTR III package even more attractive

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss House of Representatives makes the CTR III package even more attractive

Kistler
Zulauf

Jacques Kistler

Rene Zulauf

The Swiss House of Representatives voted on the Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III) on March 16 and 17. The House voted, among others, in favour of the following replacement measures to compensate for the abolition of special income tax regimes:

  • Introduction of notional interest deduction (NID) on a federal level – and at a cantonal/communal level at the discretion of the cantons;

  • Introduction of a patent box with the possibility for the cantons for a full relief;

  • Introduction of R&D super deductions extended to foreign R&D activities with a super deduction that is not limited to 150%, but is at the discretion of the cantons;

  • Tax privileged release of hidden reserves for companies transitioning out of tax privileged regimes and step up on migration of companies or activities to Switzerland;

  • Reduced annual capital tax on participations, patented IP and on intra-group loans;

  • Introduction of a tonnage tax for maritime shipping companies;

  • Limitation of the combined tax relief resulting from the release of hidden reserves when transitioning out of tax privileged regimes, the patent box, the R&D super deductions and the NID to 80%.

In turn, the abolition of the 1% capital issuance tax has been postponed for now.

The tax reform package voted for by the Swiss House of Representatives will now go back to the Swiss Senate, which proposed a somewhat more restrictive version of the tax reform package. The two parliamentary chambers will have to settle their differences in the summer 2016 session between May 30 and June 17 2016.

In addition, there may be a referendum and a national vote on the legislation. Cantonal tax laws would subsequently have to be amended, so the law would likely become effective at the earliest on January 1 2019.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and Rene Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6359 and +41 58 279 8164

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Gift this article