Spain: Control of state aid in Canary Islands investments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: Control of state aid in Canary Islands investments

Vinuela
Acosta

Antonio Viñuela Llanos

César Acosta Criado

The Canary Islands economic and tax regime (REF), which we have mentioned in past collaborations in reference to the tax advantages of investing into, and from, the Canary Islands, has been recognised in the Spanish Constitution and by the European Union (EU), which has authorised the REF in accordance with Community Law, considering the tax incentives of the REF as state aid.

In this context, the tax part of the REF is formed by various tax incentives applicable to both direct and indirect taxation, including the reserve for investments (RIC) in the Canary Islands, the tax credit for investments in the Canary Islands, the special Canary Island economic zone (ZEC), the reduction for the production of tangible assets in the Canary Islands, and other incentives, such as the tax credit for investments in territories of West Africa and for advertising and publicity expenses, which can, where certain requirements are met, produce effective corporate income tax rates of 2.5% or 4%.

Since its basic legislation was reformed as of January 1 2015, not only have its tax incentives improved considerably, but new mechanisms of individual taxpayer control have been established as well as certain limits on the level of aid provided when those tax incentives are applied together with others which may also lead to the constitution of state aid.

This new control system entails a change in the practical concept of the application of the tax incentives of the REF, given that not only must each one be applied correctly but certain restrictions are placed on the accumulation of aid obtained through all the incentives applicable in the context of the Canary Islands REF and any others, no matter what kind, deemed state aid, which cannot exceed certain limits.

Thus, the application of the REF and of its tax incentives is subject to an individual control procedure (and then to administrative review) of the level of accumulated aid.

On this basis, the operating procedures of the companies investing into, and from, the Canary Islands that benefit from the tax incentives of the REF should include certain control mechanisms, given that:

  • the aid obtained by the beneficiaries of that regime will be included annually in an informational return;

  • specific rules are established for computing them to determine the accumulation thereof, while specifying the limits applicable to that accumulation; and

  • the procedure for reimbursing any aids obtained in excess of those limits and rules on penalties is established.

The authority to monitor and control that accumulation of aid, no matter what kind of aid it is, pertains to the State Tax Agency, without prejudice to the authority attributed to other bodies of the public administration, in particular to the Central Government Controller's Office.

Thus, without missing the opportunity to benefit from the unquestionable advantages of the REF in the Canary Islands, an excellent territory for making investments due to its beneficial tax regime and legal certainty, and which has a low-tax system that is ideal for setting up business platforms for the whole world, rigorous control of the aids granted must be established in order to adapt the use of those tax advantages to Community legislation.

Antonio Viñuela Llanos (antonio.vinuela@garrigues.com) and César Acosta Criado (cesar.acosta@garrigues.com), Canary Islands

Garrigues Canarias

Tel: +34 922 20 55 67/+34 92 822 94 79

Website: www.garrigues.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The partnership model was looking antiquated even before the UK chancellor’s expected tax raid on LLPs was revealed. An additional tax burden may finally kill it off
The US’s GILTI regime will not be forced upon American multinationals in foreign jurisdictions, Bloomberg has reported; in other news, Ropes & Gray hired two tax partners from Linklaters
APAs should provide a pragmatic means to agree to an arm's-length outcome for an Australian entity and for the ATO, the tax authority said
Overall revenues and average profit per partner also increased in the UK, the ‘big four’ firm revealed
Increasingly complex reporting requirements contributed towards the firm’s growth in tax, it said
Sector-specific business taxes, private equity tax treatment reform and changes to the taxation of non-residents are all on the cards for the UK, authors from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer predict
The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
Gift this article