Switzerland: VAT and e-invoicing: Switzerland back on track

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: VAT and e-invoicing: Switzerland back on track

Switzerland has strict e-invoicing rules. However, thanks to the principle of free consideration of evidence (contained in article 81 (3) of the Swiss VAT Law), the strict e-invoicing rules which require that all VAT relevant e-invoices are digitally signed by one of the four Swiss-admitted digital signature providers can be met with other methods of comparable quality.

Although the strict rules in the e-invoicing legislation remain a safe harbour rule, the Swiss Federal Tax Administration (SFTA) has moved closer to the general EU rules recently and has approved different ways of accepting e-invoices.

As with hard copy invoices, the SFTA requires that the integrity and authenticity of the e-invoices are assured. Whenever the safe harbour rule for e-invoices with compliant advanced digital signature is not followed, taxpayers can prove integrity and authenticity of e-invoices via other documents of the procure-to-pay process, such as underlying contracts, order sheets, bills of delivery, booking records, payments and so on, and companies should establish an internal control system that allows a constant and reliable audit trail between procurement process, e-invoice and payment.

The internal control system should prove the authenticity and integrity of e-invoice data on a permanent basis. Once the internal control system on procure-to-pay replaces safe harbour conditions as a standard, businesses are recommended to thoroughly establish a new procure-to-pay internal control process which is regularly audited.

In order to establish a sophisticated internal control system that provides a similar quality as the safe harbour rules, businesses can seek discussion with SFTA and work towards a review and confirmation of their procure-to-pay internal control process.

In conclusion, it is good to know that the SFTA arrived in the modern age of e-business and offers alternatives to the often impractical strict digital signing of e-invoices.

Benno Suter (bsuter@deloitte.ch) and Tanja Blättler (tblaettler@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6366 and +41 58 279 6340

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Gift this article