Indonesia: New regulation provides opportunity for further tax amnesty

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indonesia: New regulation provides opportunity for further tax amnesty

intl-updates-small.jpg

The Minister of Finance (MoF) enacted MoF Regulation No. 165/PMK.03/2017 on November 20 2017, concerning the second amendment to MoF Regulation No. 118/PMK.03/2016 regarding the implementation of Law No. 11 of 2006 concerning the tax amnesty (MoF Regulation 165). The MoF Regulation 165 provides amnesty for those who did not participate in the tax amnesty programme and those who participated but have not reported all of their assets.

Article 44A of the MoF Regulation 165 specifically stipulates that a taxpayer may disclose:

  • Assets that have not, or have not fully, been disclosed in the statement letter required for the tax amnesty programme (Statement Letter); or

  • Assets that have not been reported in the annual income tax return, for so long as the Director General of Tax has not been made aware of the data and/or information on such assets.

The assets herein will be regarded as income and shall be imposed with income tax in accordance with the relevant regulations (in this case, Government Regulation No. 36 of 2017 concerning the imposition of income tax on certain income in the form of net assets that are treated or regarded as income). The amount of income tax shall be calculated by multiplying the tariff under the relevant regulations and the amount of the undisclosed/not fully disclosed/not reported assets (as relevant). The said assets shall be disclosed by submitting a final periodic tax return, enclosing evidence of payment of income tax on the assets. In the event of underpaid income tax, a tax underpayment assessment letter will be issued.

In addition, under the previous MoF regulations, it has been stipulated that taxpayers having obtained a Statement Letter and paid a sum for immovable assets in the form of land and/or building where the title has not been transferred to such taxpayers, must be transferred to be in the name of the taxpayers. These taxpayers are entitled to obtain tax exemption for income tax imposed for such transfers of title by obtaining an exemption certificate, provided that:

  • The ownership documents of the relevant land and/or building are still in the name of nominee/grantor/testator/heir; and

  • The application of transfer of title or the execution of a statement letter by the taxpayer and the nominee/grantor/testator/heir before a notary stating that the taxpayer is indeed the true owner of the assets is conducted by December 31 2017.

However, in practice, the MoF noticed that almost 20% of the total submitted applications of exemption certificates as per November 16 2017 were rejected due to various reasons, including discrepancy between the contents of the Statement Letter and the supporting data (e.g. discrepancy in the total area of the land/building, address/location, etc.). Through the enactment of the MoF Regulation 165, the MoF allows these taxpayers to only submit a photocopy of the Statement Letter to the land conveyancer for the purpose of a transfer of title to be able to enjoy the tax exemption. Note, however, the photocopy of the Statement Letter will only be valid to the extent that it is used by December 31 2017.

Karyadi-Freddy
Santoso

Freddy Karyadi (fkaryadi@abnrlaw.com) and Nina Cornelia Santoso (nsantoso@abnrlaw.com), Jakarta

Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro, Law Offices

Tel: +62 21 250 5125

Website: www.abnrlaw.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
After joining Milbank from Akin Gump, the fund tax specialist discusses sponsor demand, practice building, and the tax challenges facing asset managers
Partner payouts could also be reduced by a fifth, it has been reported
There is no logical reason not to extend an exemption from EU CFC rules to multinationals headquartered in side-by-side jurisdictions, USCIB said
Gift this article