South Africa: Taxation Laws Amendment Bill 2017

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: Taxation Laws Amendment Bill 2017

intl-updates-small.jpg

Following public consultation on the draft bill earlier in the year, the final version of the 2017 Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (TLAB) is now before Parliament.

Broadening of CFC rules

In the draft TLAB, measures were proposed to bring within the controlled foreign company (CFC) net, foreign companies held by discretionary foreign trusts with one or more South African tax resident beneficiaries. The proposals were very broad in scope and would have affected many structures that were in no way tax driven. Following extensive lobbying, these proposals have been dropped in the TLAB. However, the definition of a CFC has been expanded to include a foreign company, the financial results of which are included in the consolidated financial statements as contemplated in IFRS 10 of any company that is a South African tax resident. This will apply in years of assessment commencing on or after January 1 2018.

Foreign employment income

Another controversial proposal in the draft bill related to the repeal of the exemption for foreign employment income derived by South African tax residents working abroad. The exemption applies to employment income of South African resident individuals who are outside South Africa rendering services for their employer for a period exceeding 183 days (60 days of which must be continuous) during any 12-month period. Instead of an outright repeal, the TLAB now proposes a narrowed exemption with a deferred implementation date of March 1 2020. After this date, the first ZAR 1 million ($73,000) of foreign remuneration will be exempt from tax in South Africa if the individual is working outside South Africa for more than 183 days (including a continuous period of at least 60 days) during any 12-month period.

Dividend stripping

With regard to disposals made on or after July 19 2017, i.e. with retrospective effect, all "extraordinary dividends", regardless of how they are funded, paid to certain shareholders within 18 months prior to, or by reason of, a disposal of any of their shares (including on liquidation) will be treated as part of the disposal proceeds. These amounts may consequently be taxable at capital gains tax rates rather than qualifying as exempt dividends.

An extraordinary dividend is any dividend that exceeds 15% of the higher of the market value of the share at the beginning of the 18-month period and its value as at the date of disposal. In the context of preference shares, where dividends are calculated with reference to an interest rate, dividends exceeding a 15% rate will qualify as extraordinary.

The rules will apply to any shareholder that holds, alone or together with any connected person(s), at least 50% of the ordinary shares or voting rights in an unlisted company (or at least 20%, if no other shareholder owns a majority of the shares or voting rights). These thresholds drop to 10% if the company is listed.

The tax neutral rollover group relief provisions that would normally apply in the context of a qualifying liquidation distribution or an amalgamation transaction will no longer override the dividend stripping provisions with effect from the date of promulgation of the TLAB.

bennett.jpg

Anne Bennett (anne.bennett@webberwentzel.com)

Webber Wentzel

Tel: +27 11 5305886

Website: www.webberwentzel.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article