Italy: Italy issues advance tax treatment ruling for logistic hubs and PEs

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Italy issues advance tax treatment ruling for logistic hubs and PEs

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-hager.png
intl-updates-small.jpg
scampuddu.jpg
nieddu.jpg

Barbara Scampuddu

Gian Luca Nieddu

The Italian tax authorities have issued a resolution that should help multinationals selling goods and services into Italy, or using the country for storage or distribution.

Article 2 of Law Decree No. 147/2015 allows multinational companies willing to carry out investments in Italy – for an amount of at least €30 million ($32 million) and resulting in relevant occupational implications – to submit the related investment plan to the Italian tax authorities and know the applicable tax treatment in advance. In accordance with the above, Resolution No. 4/E, dated January 17 2017, was released by the Italian revenue agency in response to a ruling request issued by a multinational group intending to enact the following three-phase investment in Italy:

  • Phase one (under completion): increase Alfa company's (Italian resident) manufacturing activities;

  • Phase two (expected by 2017-18): introduce a new production line into Alfa plant, through which Alfa will be acting as a contract manufacturer for its foreign related party Beta; and

  • Phase three (expected by 2018-19): create an Italian storage and distribution centre from where Beta shall distribute worldwide goods and merchandise coming from different group plants. This centre will be managed by a professional logistic service provider based on a specific agreement with Beta.

By means of its ruling request, the group wished to ascertain if setting up a storage and distribution centre in Italy (phase three above) may constitute a permanent establishment (PE) of Beta in Italy, as provided by Article 5 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and Article 162 of the Italian Tax Code.

The Italian revenue agency clarified that, in principle, a storage and distribution centre of Beta in Italy may be considered as a "fixed place of business" (as defined by paragraph 1, point 4, of the commentary to the OECD Model) if used by Beta to carry out – even non-exclusively – its "ordinary" business activity. However, based on the indications set forth by Article 5, paragraph 3 of the tax treaty between Italy and Beta's country of residence, no Italian PE can be identified if the facilities are used "solely for the purpose of storage, display or delivery of goods or merchandise belonging to the enterprise", which are in fact preparatory or auxiliary activities.

Therefore, Beta's storage and distribution centre in Italy shall not be considered as an Italian PE of the foreign company if all the below conditions are met:

1) This facility must be used exclusively to carry out activities for the storage, display or delivery of goods. No other function whatsoever, different from those "preparatory or auxiliary activities" mentioned before – including, for instance: sale orders collection, the sales of Beta's goods and others – shall be performed therein;

2) The said storage, display or delivery activities can only be related to goods belonging to Beta. Therefore, a PE would be identified if, in its Italian storage and distribution centre, Beta carried out storage, display or delivery of merchandise belonging to Alfa or other companies; and

3) Based on the above, any finished good or merchandise that Beta intends to sell in Italy must leave its storage and distribution centre before the sale is enacted.

Furthermore, the Italian revenue agency stated that, based on the information provided by the group, no Beta "personal" PE should be identified in Italy, provided that no person therein – other than independent agents – would be entitled to sign agreements on behalf of Beta or anyhow bind or represent the foreign company before third parties.

Barbara Scampuddu (barbara.scampuddu@hager-partners.it) and Gian Luca Nieddu (gianluca.nieddu@hager-partners.it)

Hager&Partners

Tel: +39 02 7780711

Website: www.hager-partners.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article