Bosnia and Herzegovina: Amendments to the Profit Tax Law in Republic of Srpska of Bosnia and Herzegovina

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Amendments to the Profit Tax Law in Republic of Srpska of Bosnia and Herzegovina

topic.jpg

Dajana Topic

The National Assembly of the Republic of Srpska (RS) adopted amendments to the Profit Tax Law on December 28 2016. The main changes entered into force on January 1 2017.

With the amendments, the Law clarifies the definition of "taxable person" and harmonises the concept of residence with the Profit Tax Law of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) and Brcko District in order to avoid double taxation. Namely, a company is considered resident in BiH if it is registered as a legal entity there. An entity has a taxable presence in BiH if it carries out business activities in the jurisdiction that meets the criteria for a permanent establishment.

The sources of taxable income are as follows:

  • Profit derived from economic activities of both residents and non-residents in RS;

  • Profit derived from the sale of property located in RS and the sale of movable property if the sale is carried out within RS;

  • Dividends, profit shares and interest income;

  • Income from copyright and similar rights;

  • Income from rent and services paid by residents or permanent establishments in RS; and

  • Capital gains on transfers of securities and shares in equity of residents or permanent establishments based in the RS.

The taxable base is the profit determined by adjusting the profit stated in the profit/loss statement, except in cases prescribed by the law. In order to harmonise provisions of the RS Profit Tax Law with the Profit Tax Law of the FBiH, interest income on bank deposits is no longer tax exempt. Amortisation of goodwill is also a non-deductible expense.

According to the recent amendments, the annual withholding tax returns must be filed by January 31 of the current year for the previous tax year, instead of the previously set date of March 31. The gross amount of payments to non-residents, such as interest income, royalties, technical service fees, insurance premiums, payments for entertainment events, rental payments for movable property and fees for telecommunication services, are all subject to withholding tax at a rate of 10%.

Considering thin capitalisation, with effect from 2017, if a legal entity has taken out a loan from a related entity at an interest rate below the market interest rate, it may reduce its taxable base by deducting the amount of interest paid. Yet, the net interest expenses must not exceed 30% of the tax base.

The new amendments also bring several changes in terms of tax incentives, so there are no longer incentives related to new employment. However, taxpayers may reduce their tax liability by 30% if they invest in manufacturing equipment, real estate and plants if the value of which exceeds 50% of their tax base in the current tax year.

Dajana Topic (dajana.topic@eurofast.eu), Banja Luka and Sarajevo

Eurofast Global

Tel: +387 51 961 610

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article