Switzerland: Swiss Federal Council to introduce revised CTR III legislation quickly

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss Federal Council to introduce revised CTR III legislation quickly

kistler.jpg
Zulauf

Jacques Kistler

Rene Zulauf

After the rejection of Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III) by the Swiss electorate on February 12 2017, the Swiss Federal Council now plans to introduce revised legislation of the tax reform quickly and has instructed the finance ministry accordingly.

The Swiss finance ministry intends to set the parameters for a revised CTR III by the end of June 2017 and plans to hold hearings with interested parties on the reform from March until the end of June 2017.

The exact parameters of a revised legislation remain open and assumptions on what a revised legislative proposal will entail are speculative in nature. However, it can reasonably be assumed that a revised CTR III will likely be a compromise built around the largely undisputed measures of the rejected tax reform. The largely undisputed measures were essentially the following parameters of the rejected tax reform, which can be reasonably expected to also be part of a revised tax reform:

  • The phasing out of all special corporate tax regimes, such as the mixed, domiciliary, holding and principal company regimes, as well as the finance branch regime;

  • A reduction of the general cantonal/communal tax rates at the discretion of the individual cantons;

  • The introduction of a mandatory cantonal-level patent box regime applicable to all patented intellectual property (IP) for which the research and development (R&D) spend occurred in Switzerland, based on the OECD modified nexus approach;

  • The introduction of cantonal R&D incentives in the form of deductions of up to 150% of qualifying R&D expenditure at the discretion of the individual cantons;

  • A step-up of asset basis (including for self-created goodwill) for direct federal and cantonal/communal tax purposes upon the migration of a company or additional activities and functions into Switzerland;

  • The tax-privileged release of hidden reserves for cantonal/communal tax purposes for companies transitioning out of tax-privileged cantonal tax regimes (such as mixed or holding companies) into ordinary taxation; and

  • A reduction of the cantonal/communal annual net wealth tax in relation to the holding of participations and of patented IP at the discretion of the individual cantons.

However, it is possible that there will also be some fine tuning around the largely undisputed parts of the tax reform, most likely in regards to R&D super deductions.

What is unlikely to remain in a revised legislation, however, is the introduction of a notional interest deduction (NID) regime at the federal level and at the discretion of the individual cantons.

Although it still may be possible for revised legislation to meet the original January 1 2019 introduction timetable at the federal level if the Swiss parliament decides on the revised legislation in its winter 2017/2018 session, since the cantons need adequate time to introduce the law into cantonal legislation, the introduction of the law may be postponed by one to two years, i.e. to January 1 2020 or 2021.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and Rene Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 8164 and +41 58 279 6359

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article