South Africa: 2018 budget: international tax proposals

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: 2018 budget: international tax proposals

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-ww.png
AdobeStock_93458480_SouthAfrica

The Minister of Finance presented the 2018 budget speech on February 21. The supporting documentation noted some potential amendments to the South African Income Tax Act which are of interest in a cross-border context.

CFC reforms on the horizon



Various proposed amendments to the controlled foreign company (CFC) legislation were published during 2017, in order to curb perceived abuse arising as a result of the utilisation of foreign discretionary trusts as intermediary vehicles to hold interests in foreign companies in order to circumvent the CFC provisions.

Among other proposals, the amendments sought to include within the definition of a CFC, a foreign company in which more than 50% of the 'participation rights' (being the rights attaching to a share) or voting rights are held by a foreign discretionary trust, if such trust has South African resident beneficiaries. In terms of the existing law, such a company would not fall within the definition of a CFC, as no 'participation rights' or voting rights could be ascribed to the beneficiaries of the trust holding the interest in the foreign company. The proposed amendments were not implemented following lobbying initiatives and public feedback, as they were considered to have far-reaching and unintended consequences.

It was announced in the 2018 budget speech that the proposed reforms were still being considered and it is likely that a revised framework will again be proposed in the coming months when draft amending legislation is published.

On a more positive note for taxpayers, an exemption from the CFC imputation rules exists if a CFC is subject to tax at an aggregate rate of foreign tax which is equal to at least 75% of the tax that would have been imposed had the CFC been tax resident in South Africa. It has been proposed that the 75% threshold be reduced in view of the fact that many countries (e.g. the UK and the US) have substantially reduced their headline corporate tax rates in recent years. No further details were provided.

Withholding tax on interest – clarifying provisions

A withholding tax on interest is levied on the payment of any interest to or for the benefit of a foreign person, if such interest arises from a source within South Africa. The relevant tax is imposed at a rate of 15% (subject to relief under applicable double tax agreements).

The withholding obligation rests with the person responsible for making the payment of the interest.

There is some uncertainty regarding the payment of interest to a South African discretionary trust, which then vests the amount in a non-resident beneficiary during the same year of assessment. The uncertainty relates to who is liable for the tax and also to who bears the obligation to withhold the tax.

It is proposed that provisions be introduced to cater for these circumstances.

VAT developments – provision of electronic services

During 2017, it was announced that the relevant regulations regarding the provision of foreign electronic services in South Africa would be broadened to include cloud computing and other online services for value added tax (VAT) purposes.

Updated draft regulations prescribing the relevant foreign electronic services are to be published for public comment.

gilmour.jpg

Sean Gilmour (sean.gilmour@webberwentzel.com), Johannesburg

Webber Wentzel

Website: www.webberwentzel.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article