Bosnia: Republic of Srpska introduces new law on the deadlines for settlement of financial obligations in commercial transactions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bosnia: Republic of Srpska introduces new law on the deadlines for settlement of financial obligations in commercial transactions

Sponsored by

Eurofast Bosnia & Herzegovnia
intl-updates

The National Assembly of the Republic of Srpska has adopted a law (New Law) that regulates the deadlines for the settlement of financial obligations and penalties applicable in cases of failure to comply.

The New Law – published in Official Gazette number 31/18 – became effective as of April 24 2018.

The New Law applies to legal entities in the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, with the exception of financial institutions, economic entities in the process of insolvency proceedings, or economic entities subject to garnishment or foreclosure arrangements.

The main novelties introduced by the New Law concerning commercial transactions are as follows:

  • The payment period must not be longer than 60 days (unless the debtor provides adequate means of security – a bank guarantee containing the terms 'irrevocable', 'unconditional', or 'debit-free at first call without objection', as well as bills of exchange issued by the bank); and

  • In cases where a contract does not specify a payment period, a default payment period of 30 days will apply.

The deadline for fulfillment of a financial obligation commences from:

  • The date the debtor received the relevant invoice or other official document;

  • The date the creditor fulfilled his/her obligation – in cases where it is not possible to determine the date of receipt of an invoice; or

  • The expiry date for the inspection of the subject of the purchase – if such a deadline is prescribed in a contract or under law.

It is important to note that the creditor is entitled to default interest in cases of delays in settling the obligation.

A fine ranging between KM5,000 ($3140) and KM15,000 will be imposed on a business entity debtor that fails to meet its financial obligations to suppliers within the stated deadlines.

A fine of between KM1,000 and KM3,000 will be imposed on the responsible physical person in the debtor entity.

The provisions of the New Law do not apply to agreements concluded before the New Law came into force.

Eurofast advises clients active in the market in Bosnia to carefully review their existing settlement and collection practices as well as future business transaction plans. Our team is ready to assist with any advice required to ensure compliance with the New Law.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article