Montenegro: Montenegro-Portugal income tax treaty enters into force

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Montenegro: Montenegro-Portugal income tax treaty enters into force

intl-updates-small.jpg

On December 10 2018, Portugal published Notice 144/2018 in the Official Gazette, announcing the new income tax treaty with Montenegro.

The treaty covers corporate profit tax and personal income tax (PIT) in Montenegro, as well as Portuguese PIT, corporate income tax (CIT) and surtaxes on CIT. The treaty applies from January 1 2019 and follows the general OECD model.

The treaty introduced the following principles and rates.

Withholding tax rate changes

  • Dividends: 5% of the gross amount of the dividend will apply if the beneficial owner (BO) is a company which holds at least 5% of the capital of the company paying the dividends (directly or indirectly). In other cases, a withholding tax (WHT) of 10% will apply to all other dividends;

  • Interest: A 10% WHT will apply to the gross amount of the interest; and

  • Royalties: A 5% WHT will apply for the use of (or the right to use) any copyright of literary, artistic, or scientific work, including cinematographic films and recordings on tape, or other media used for radio or television broadcasting, or other means of reproduction or transmission or computer software. Otherwise, a 10% WHT will apply to the gross amount of the royalties for the use of, or the right to use, any patent, trademark, design or model, plan, secret formula, or process, or for information concerning industrial, commercial, or scientific experience.

Capital gain changes

One of the two states may tax capital gains derived by a resident of the other state in the following scenarios:

  • Gains acquired from the alienation of immovable property situated in another state;

  • Gains from the alienation of movable property forming part of the business property of a permanent establishment (PE), which a company of one state has in the other state; and

  • Gains derived by a resident of one state from the alienation of shares deriving more than 50% of their value, directly or indirectly, from immovable property situated in the other state.

Furthermore, gains from the alienation of ships or aircraft operated in international traffic will be taxable only in the country in which the place of effective management of the company is located. When it comes to the gains acquired from the alienation of other properties than to which have been referred, such gains shall be taxable only in the state where the alienator is a resident.

The treaty was concluded in English, Portuguese and in Montenegrin. In the case of any divergence of interpretation, the English text prevails.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Growing GAAR scrutiny is driving taxpayers to look beyond legal form and demonstrate the commercial rationale underpinning tax-efficient structures
Pillar two has been clients’ ‘biggest headache’ but also a driver of growth for MHA, which believes it has the edge over its big four rivals
Public country-by-country reporting is exposing multinational tax data to investors, journalists and competitors, creating fresh risks for businesses
Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
Gift this article