Brazil’s consumption tax reform still leaves uncertainty

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Brazil’s consumption tax reform still leaves uncertainty

Sponsored by

logo.png
Brazil flag at centre of compass, with a pointer to a question mark symbol

Gabriel Caldiron Rezende of Machado Associados comments on the beginning of the tax reform implementation phase and concerns about pending regulation

Brazil’s consumption tax reform provided for an overhaul of the national tax system, implementing a VAT system with a federal contribution on goods and services (CBS) and a state and municipal shared tax on goods and services (IBS).

The implementation will continue until 2033, during which period the current taxes will be gradually substituted by CBS and IBS. As previously discussed, 2026 is a test phase, under which taxpayers are obliged to issue invoices stating CBS and IBS at a combined rate of 1% (0.9% for CBS and 0.1% for IBS) but are exempt from paying these taxes if the ancillary tax obligations are complied with.

However, at the end of 2025, there was still much uncertainty, as several highly relevant regulations were yet to be enacted and doubts clarified, and, at that time, Supplementary Bill of Law 108/2024 (which resulted in Supplementary Law 227/2026) was under discussion, aiming to establish an IBS Management Committee (CGIBS) and provide for IBS administrative litigation proceedings, tax penalties, and rules related to the distribution of the IBS collection proceeds to federal entities, among other related matters.

Due to the uncertainties regarding compliance under the tax reform, on December 23 2025, the Federal Revenue Service (RFB) and CGIBS issued Joint Act 01/2025, to address the ancillary tax obligations necessary for IBS and CBS tax compliance in 2026. The act provides that, until the first day of the fourth month following the publication of the common part of the IBS and CBS regulations, no penalties will be applied for failure to register the IBS and CBS fields in tax documents, and the requirement for a waiver of the IBS and CBS collection will be considered fulfilled.

On April 29 2026, the much-anticipated regulations were published under Decree 12,955/2026 (the CBS Regulation) and CGIBS Resolution 06/2026 (the IBS Regulation). Both regulations share common rules applicable to CBS and IBS, while having specific provisions for each tax. Considering this, the obligation to state CBS and IBS in invoices begins as of August 3 2026.

Key questions unanswered

Taxpayers have still raised several concerns as, contrary to expectations, the CBS and IBS regulations mostly reproduce the wording of Supplementary Law 214/2025, leave several matters pending further regulation, and present rules with unclear applicability.

Among the unclear matters, the regulations make 175 references to a Joint Act of the RFB and CGIBS to be enacted to further regulate matters or provide further rules. This is very concerning as it was expected that the regulations would be issued in a single act, or two, thus achieving the simplification intended by the consumption tax reform.

Also, several types of transactions that are regulated in detail for state VAT (ICMS) purposes are not even mentioned in the CBS and IBS regulations, such as toll manufacturing, indirect exports, sales in consignment, and warehousing. Accordingly, at this point, it is not possible to precisely determine the CBS and IBS treatment and compliance in these (and other) transactions.

Most likely, the regulations were issued to comply with RFB/CGIBS Joint Act 01/2025, thus providing some time for a test phase, which was partially suspended. To this end, the RFB and CGIBS allowed national sector entities to present suggestions for amendments to the regulations.

As an illustration of the uncertainties, the Federal Accounting Council presented 133 amendment suggestions.

Uncertainty persists despite implementation progress

In summary, the long-awaited CBS and IBS regulations ended up being overly simple in view of the necessary regulations demanded by Supplementary Law 214/2025, thus perpetuating undesired uncertainty at the beginning of the consumption tax reform’s implementation.

Furthermore, the clear need for additional regulation frustrated expectations that the reform would deliver simplicity and legal security, as a door has been left open for numerous other tax regulations and interpretations, which is one of the major causes of controversies under the current tax system.

Unfortunately, taxpayers must organise themselves according to the current rules, and prepare for the full levy of CBS in 2027, even though its tax rate has not been issued yet.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Advisers expect consumption tax reform to stay on course, but debt pressures could push the government towards tougher enforcement and incentive reviews
The firm demonstrated its sweet spot of litigation with an international twist with the recent win for the Danish tax authority…but it’s not a tax case
The recently formed firm has taken a break from hiring EY talent to expand its transactional tax and tax technology capabilities
The AI platform, founded last year by two school friends, is partnering with challenger firms like Unity Advisory and A&M Tax to launch its own assault on the AI tax market
Not only has Aurtus received recognition from ITR in the past, but its founder was both a partner at KPMG and co-founder of Dhruva Advisors
Clients care more about considered counsel than rapid media-friendly soundbites, says Matthew Gilleard, associate director at Infinite
It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Gift this article