The fine line between simplification and standardisation in EU tax law

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The fine line between simplification and standardisation in EU tax law

Sponsored by

sponsored-firm-mlgts.jpg
Line of EU flags

The EU’s tax decluttering and simplification agenda promises reduced compliance burdens but risks new complexity without careful coordination, says Francisca Marabuto Tavares of Morais Leitão, Galvão Teles, Soares da Silva & Associados

In March 2025, the Council of the European Union approved the so-called tax decluttering and simplification agenda, an initiative aimed at rationalising and modernising the complex regulatory framework of EU taxation. Its main objective is to make the applicable legislative landscape clearer, more coherent, and more functional, easing the compliance burden on taxpayers and promoting a more efficient application of tax rules across Europe.

This initiative comes at a time when tax obligations – especially for companies operating in multiple jurisdictions – have become increasingly dense, technical, and costly to comply with. The proliferation of directives, regulations, special regimes, and reporting mechanisms – many of them overlapping or poorly coordinated – has resulted in a system that is difficult to interpret, even for experienced professionals. The council’s initiative therefore represents an effort to eliminate redundant rules, simplify compliance obligations, and clarify legal concepts that currently generate uncertainty and litigation.

Main points and implications

Among the key points of this agenda is the intention to revise directives such as the DAC (the Directive on Administrative Cooperation), the common VAT system, and withholding tax regimes applicable to dividends and interest. The proposal calls for the following measures, among others:

  • The standardisation of reporting formats;

  • Alignment of deadlines among EU member states;

  • Digitalisation of tax residency certificates; and

  • The elimination of duplicate reporting requirements that affect cross-border businesses.

This movement runs parallel to other ongoing reforms, such as the VAT in the Digital Age package and the Faster Directive, and is motivated by a growing consensus on the need to align administrative efficiency with tax fairness and economic competitiveness.

The practical implications of this agenda for businesses are significant.

There is a clear potential for reducing compliance costs, minimising errors caused by overlapping obligations, and increasing predictability in processes such as reimbursements, offsetting, and reporting of intra-EU operations. For multinational groups – particularly those that include SMEs – the current system represents a disproportionate burden, requiring the outsourcing of specialised services in each jurisdiction, constant adaptation to local changes, and exposure to penalties in cases of non-compliance with technical requirements. Harmonising procedures could facilitate centralised tax management and foster greater transparency in relations with tax administrations.

Potential issues

The simplification process may generate additional challenges, however, especially if not accompanied by rigorous legal coordination across the various national legal systems. Many domestic tax regimes were designed based on their specific economic, social, or political contexts, and are structured to serve local objectives, such as investment promotion, regional development, or support for strategic sectors. The imposition of uniform rules at EU level may require profound changes to these regimes, posing risks of internal inconsistency or even incompatibility with national constitutional principles, particularly those enshrining the legality of taxation or the requirement of parliamentary approval for tax measures.

Another sensitive issue relates to the use of common legal concepts in different contexts but with divergent meanings. Terms such as “permanent establishment”, “beneficial owner”, or “tax residence” are currently interpreted differently across member states, which has led to considerable uncertainty and controversy in the field of international taxation.

Poorly calibrated simplification may paradoxically exacerbate existing complexity, creating an illusion of uniformity where substantial divergence persists.

Moreover, the transition to harmonised digital formats requires substantial investment by national tax authorities, many of which face technical, budgetary, and operational constraints that may hinder effective implementation of the new rules.

There is also a risk that this simplification agenda, however well intentioned, may result in an additional regulatory layer, unless existing rules are clearly repealed or replaced. Experience shows that the EU legislator sometimes adds new obligations without fully removing outdated ones, undermining the declared goal of reducing bureaucracy. The key to the success of this initiative lies in the ability to structurally rethink the EU’s fiscal governance model, ensuring not only the technical coherence of legal instruments but also their enforceability and acceptance by taxpayers.

It is also worth noting that the simplification agenda is part of a broader movement to transform European taxation, in response to internal and external pressures that demand greater integration, transparency, and effectiveness. The digitalisation of tax systems, enhanced cooperation in combating tax evasion, and the growing interconnection between fiscal policy and environmental or social objectives require a new legislative approach – less fragmented and more outcome-oriented.

In this context, legislative simplification is an essential condition to ensure that taxation remains a legitimate public policy tool, capable of financing the welfare state without undermining competitiveness or public trust.

Final thoughts on the initiative

The EU’s tax simplification agenda is a timely and potentially transformative initiative, but its success will depend on a careful balance between political ambition and legal precision. Only a prudent, legally sensitive, and technically consistent implementation can ensure that the simplification effort translates into genuine tax justice and administrative efficiency.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
TP is a growing priority for West and Central African tax authorities, writes Winnie Maliko, but enforcement remains inconsistent, and data limitations persist
The UK tax agency has appointed six independent industry specialists to the panel
The two tax partners have significant experience and expertise in transactional and tax structuring matters
Gift this article