Portugal's NHR 2.0: could the new regime still be attractive to pensioners?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Portugal's NHR 2.0: could the new regime still be attractive to pensioners?

Sponsored by

sponsored-firm-mlgts.jpg
Porto skyline

João Sousa Magalhães of Morais Leitão, Galvão Teles, Soares da Silva & Associados considers the impact of the Portuguese tax authorities’ rulings on early redemptions and lump-sum payments from foreign pension plans

The new NHR 2.0 and the requirements for applying its exemptions

The end of Portugal’s non-habitual residents’ regime (NHR) led to the creation of a new tax regime aimed at attracting qualified professionals to the country: the Tax Incentive for Scientific Research and Innovation (NHR 2.0).

This new regime provides that, for a period of 10 years, employment and self-employment income derived from scientific research and innovation activities is taxed at a fixed rate of 20%. It also provides for a series of exemptions (with progression and subject to reporting) on foreign-sourced income, with the exception of pension income (taxed progressively up to 53%) and income from blacklisted jurisdictions (taxed at a fixed rate of 35%).

Regarding the legislative approach used in the new NHR 2.0 regime, the mechanism for applying exemptions stands out. For these to apply, the income must fall within one of the eligible categories and be foreign-sourced.

This legislative approach contrasts significantly with that of the former NHR regime, which – except for the exemption of foreign pensions (taxed at a fixed rate of 10% from 2020) – conditioned the granting of exemptions for the remaining income categories on the verification of additional requirements. For example, in the case of foreign-sourced employment income, this income had to be effectively taxed in the source state, and in the case of foreign-sourced investment income, both the residence and the source state should have taxing rights under an applicable double tax treaty (DTT) or, in the absence of a DTT, under the rules of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital.

Tax authorities’ rulings on early redemptions and lump-sum payments from pension plans

The difference in the methodology for applying exemptions, when analysed in light of the Portuguese tax authorities’ interpretation of pension plan payments, may allow taxpayers enrolled in the NHR 2.0 regime to benefit from a total or partial exemption on income arising from early redemptions and lump-sum payments from pension plans (a case-by-case analysis is required). This happens because, although the new regime provides for the taxation of pension income up to 53%, the tax authorities’ rulings have been reclassifying pension plan payments and stating that, under certain rules, early redemptions and lump-sum payments should be regarded as employment income and/or investment income – both categories for which the exemption under the new NHR 2.0 regime only requires that the income be foreign-sourced.

Thus, while under the previous NHR regime the Portuguese tax authorities’ reclassification was disadvantageous for the taxpayer because it tightened the criteria to benefit from exemptions (as mentioned above), the opposite effect occurs under NHR 2.0.

In light of the above, the author believes that the tax authorities’ interpretation partly subverts the spirit of the NHR and NHR 2.0 regimes. This is because, under the former NHR regime – which aimed to provide a more favourable tax regime for pensioners – the tax authorities’ reclassification of early redemptions and lump-sum payments as employment and investment income made it harder to access the exemption (or the 10% tax rate for beneficiaries from 2020). However, under NHR 2.0, which is not intended for pensioners, the tax authorities’ interpretation now allows for the exemption.

What can NHR 2.0 beneficiaries expect from the Portuguese tax authorities?

If the tax authorities were to reclassify income arising from early redemption or lump-sum payments from pension plans as pension income (so that it would not be exempt under the new NHR 2.0 regime), this would mean that the thousands of beneficiaries of the former NHR regime would become eligible for the exemption or the fixed 10% tax rate on pensions.

Additionally, since NHR 2.0 is still in its early stages, in the coming years there will likely be more taxpayers registered under the former NHR regime than in the new NHR 2.0, especially considering the high number of new registrations in the final year in which it was still possible to apply for the regime (2024). These taxpayers will still be able to benefit from the old NHR regime for 10 years starting from the year of registration.

At least for now, there does not appear to be much incentive for the Portuguese tax authorities to change their interpretation on pension plan income, meaning that the true beneficiaries of the status quo might be those who, under the new NHR 2.0 regime, happen to receive income from an early redemption or a lump-sum payment from a foreign pension plan.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
Gift this article