Portugal's NHR 2.0: could the new regime still be attractive to pensioners?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Portugal's NHR 2.0: could the new regime still be attractive to pensioners?

Sponsored by

sponsored-firm-mlgts.jpg
Porto skyline

João Sousa Magalhães of Morais Leitão, Galvão Teles, Soares da Silva & Associados considers the impact of the Portuguese tax authorities’ rulings on early redemptions and lump-sum payments from foreign pension plans

The new NHR 2.0 and the requirements for applying its exemptions

The end of Portugal’s non-habitual residents’ regime (NHR) led to the creation of a new tax regime aimed at attracting qualified professionals to the country: the Tax Incentive for Scientific Research and Innovation (NHR 2.0).

This new regime provides that, for a period of 10 years, employment and self-employment income derived from scientific research and innovation activities is taxed at a fixed rate of 20%. It also provides for a series of exemptions (with progression and subject to reporting) on foreign-sourced income, with the exception of pension income (taxed progressively up to 53%) and income from blacklisted jurisdictions (taxed at a fixed rate of 35%).

Regarding the legislative approach used in the new NHR 2.0 regime, the mechanism for applying exemptions stands out. For these to apply, the income must fall within one of the eligible categories and be foreign-sourced.

This legislative approach contrasts significantly with that of the former NHR regime, which – except for the exemption of foreign pensions (taxed at a fixed rate of 10% from 2020) – conditioned the granting of exemptions for the remaining income categories on the verification of additional requirements. For example, in the case of foreign-sourced employment income, this income had to be effectively taxed in the source state, and in the case of foreign-sourced investment income, both the residence and the source state should have taxing rights under an applicable double tax treaty (DTT) or, in the absence of a DTT, under the rules of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital.

Tax authorities’ rulings on early redemptions and lump-sum payments from pension plans

The difference in the methodology for applying exemptions, when analysed in light of the Portuguese tax authorities’ interpretation of pension plan payments, may allow taxpayers enrolled in the NHR 2.0 regime to benefit from a total or partial exemption on income arising from early redemptions and lump-sum payments from pension plans (a case-by-case analysis is required). This happens because, although the new regime provides for the taxation of pension income up to 53%, the tax authorities’ rulings have been reclassifying pension plan payments and stating that, under certain rules, early redemptions and lump-sum payments should be regarded as employment income and/or investment income – both categories for which the exemption under the new NHR 2.0 regime only requires that the income be foreign-sourced.

Thus, while under the previous NHR regime the Portuguese tax authorities’ reclassification was disadvantageous for the taxpayer because it tightened the criteria to benefit from exemptions (as mentioned above), the opposite effect occurs under NHR 2.0.

In light of the above, the author believes that the tax authorities’ interpretation partly subverts the spirit of the NHR and NHR 2.0 regimes. This is because, under the former NHR regime – which aimed to provide a more favourable tax regime for pensioners – the tax authorities’ reclassification of early redemptions and lump-sum payments as employment and investment income made it harder to access the exemption (or the 10% tax rate for beneficiaries from 2020). However, under NHR 2.0, which is not intended for pensioners, the tax authorities’ interpretation now allows for the exemption.

What can NHR 2.0 beneficiaries expect from the Portuguese tax authorities?

If the tax authorities were to reclassify income arising from early redemption or lump-sum payments from pension plans as pension income (so that it would not be exempt under the new NHR 2.0 regime), this would mean that the thousands of beneficiaries of the former NHR regime would become eligible for the exemption or the fixed 10% tax rate on pensions.

Additionally, since NHR 2.0 is still in its early stages, in the coming years there will likely be more taxpayers registered under the former NHR regime than in the new NHR 2.0, especially considering the high number of new registrations in the final year in which it was still possible to apply for the regime (2024). These taxpayers will still be able to benefit from the old NHR regime for 10 years starting from the year of registration.

At least for now, there does not appear to be much incentive for the Portuguese tax authorities to change their interpretation on pension plan income, meaning that the true beneficiaries of the status quo might be those who, under the new NHR 2.0 regime, happen to receive income from an early redemption or a lump-sum payment from a foreign pension plan.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Gift this article