Portugal's NHR 2.0: could the new regime still be attractive to pensioners?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Portugal's NHR 2.0: could the new regime still be attractive to pensioners?

Sponsored by

sponsored-firm-mlgts.jpg
Porto skyline

João Sousa Magalhães of Morais Leitão, Galvão Teles, Soares da Silva & Associados considers the impact of the Portuguese tax authorities’ rulings on early redemptions and lump-sum payments from foreign pension plans

The new NHR 2.0 and the requirements for applying its exemptions

The end of Portugal’s non-habitual residents’ regime (NHR) led to the creation of a new tax regime aimed at attracting qualified professionals to the country: the Tax Incentive for Scientific Research and Innovation (NHR 2.0).

This new regime provides that, for a period of 10 years, employment and self-employment income derived from scientific research and innovation activities is taxed at a fixed rate of 20%. It also provides for a series of exemptions (with progression and subject to reporting) on foreign-sourced income, with the exception of pension income (taxed progressively up to 53%) and income from blacklisted jurisdictions (taxed at a fixed rate of 35%).

Regarding the legislative approach used in the new NHR 2.0 regime, the mechanism for applying exemptions stands out. For these to apply, the income must fall within one of the eligible categories and be foreign-sourced.

This legislative approach contrasts significantly with that of the former NHR regime, which – except for the exemption of foreign pensions (taxed at a fixed rate of 10% from 2020) – conditioned the granting of exemptions for the remaining income categories on the verification of additional requirements. For example, in the case of foreign-sourced employment income, this income had to be effectively taxed in the source state, and in the case of foreign-sourced investment income, both the residence and the source state should have taxing rights under an applicable double tax treaty (DTT) or, in the absence of a DTT, under the rules of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital.

Tax authorities’ rulings on early redemptions and lump-sum payments from pension plans

The difference in the methodology for applying exemptions, when analysed in light of the Portuguese tax authorities’ interpretation of pension plan payments, may allow taxpayers enrolled in the NHR 2.0 regime to benefit from a total or partial exemption on income arising from early redemptions and lump-sum payments from pension plans (a case-by-case analysis is required). This happens because, although the new regime provides for the taxation of pension income up to 53%, the tax authorities’ rulings have been reclassifying pension plan payments and stating that, under certain rules, early redemptions and lump-sum payments should be regarded as employment income and/or investment income – both categories for which the exemption under the new NHR 2.0 regime only requires that the income be foreign-sourced.

Thus, while under the previous NHR regime the Portuguese tax authorities’ reclassification was disadvantageous for the taxpayer because it tightened the criteria to benefit from exemptions (as mentioned above), the opposite effect occurs under NHR 2.0.

In light of the above, the author believes that the tax authorities’ interpretation partly subverts the spirit of the NHR and NHR 2.0 regimes. This is because, under the former NHR regime – which aimed to provide a more favourable tax regime for pensioners – the tax authorities’ reclassification of early redemptions and lump-sum payments as employment and investment income made it harder to access the exemption (or the 10% tax rate for beneficiaries from 2020). However, under NHR 2.0, which is not intended for pensioners, the tax authorities’ interpretation now allows for the exemption.

What can NHR 2.0 beneficiaries expect from the Portuguese tax authorities?

If the tax authorities were to reclassify income arising from early redemption or lump-sum payments from pension plans as pension income (so that it would not be exempt under the new NHR 2.0 regime), this would mean that the thousands of beneficiaries of the former NHR regime would become eligible for the exemption or the fixed 10% tax rate on pensions.

Additionally, since NHR 2.0 is still in its early stages, in the coming years there will likely be more taxpayers registered under the former NHR regime than in the new NHR 2.0, especially considering the high number of new registrations in the final year in which it was still possible to apply for the regime (2024). These taxpayers will still be able to benefit from the old NHR regime for 10 years starting from the year of registration.

At least for now, there does not appear to be much incentive for the Portuguese tax authorities to change their interpretation on pension plan income, meaning that the true beneficiaries of the status quo might be those who, under the new NHR 2.0 regime, happen to receive income from an early redemption or a lump-sum payment from a foreign pension plan.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Using tax to enhance its standing as a funds location is behind Luxembourg’s measures aimed at clarifying ATAD 2 and making its carried interest regime more attractive
Encompassing everything from international scandals to seismic political events, it’s a privilege to cover the intriguing world of tax
In his newly created role, current SSA commissioner Bisignano will oversee all day-to-day IRS operations; in other news, Ryan has made its second acquisition in two weeks
In the age of borderless commerce, money flows faster than regulation. While digital platforms cross oceans in milliseconds, tax authorities often lag. Indonesia has decided it can wait no longer
The tariffs are disrupting global supply chains and creating a lot of uncertainty, tax expert Miguel Medeiros told ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum
Corporate counsel should combine deep technical knowledge with strategic dynamism, says Agarwal, winner of ITR’s EMEA In-house Indirect Tax Leader of the Year award
Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Gift this article