A practical approach to tax transformation: six crucial areas to address

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

A practical approach to tax transformation: six crucial areas to address

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
stockvault-business-planning266839.jpg

Niklas Elofsson and Vsevolod Konyshev of KPMG Sweden draw on their experience to explore how successful tax functions implement structured transformation strategies to manage complexity and deliver long-term value

Tax functions face increasing pressure from regulatory complexity, heightened enforcement, and significant resource demands, notably around pillar two implementation. Reactive measures are insufficient. This article outlines the practical approaches the authors observe in organisations that successfully navigate these changes. Success requires a structured approach addressing six interdependent areas:

  • People;

  • Governance;

  • Process;

  • Data;

  • Technology; and

  • The tax delivery model.

Strategic assessment and planning

Successful transformations begin with an assessment of current capabilities across these six core areas. This involves identifying specific strengths and weaknesses. For example, successful teams review tax policies against current business objectives (governance), map core workflows to pinpoint inefficiencies (process), and critically evaluate tax data quality, data accessibility, and how it sources and transforms its data (data). This assessment informs a transformation roadmap, prioritising initiatives based on tangible impact and feasibility.

Successful departments focus on initial, high-impact, lower-effort projects to build momentum and demonstrate value quickly.

Leveraging data and technology for tax operations

Effective tax functions treat data as a critical asset by establishing a single, reliable source, often mandating its capture directly within ERP systems or in a dedicated tax data repository. Success also requires implementing data quality controls from the outset and establishing clear definitions and intended use for essential tax data elements. This provides a unified definition for data across the function, ensuring data accuracy and consistent interpretation for reporting, compliance, and strategic analysis.

Developing a clear technology strategy involves integrating a portfolio of fit-for-purpose tools, avoiding reliance on a single solution. This means employing rule-based automation for high-volume, repetitive compliance tasks, utilising data analytics platforms to extract insights and model scenarios from historical tax data, and implementing specialised tax tools or tax engines for complex calculations such as transfer pricing adjustments or indirect tax determinations. AI can be leveraged for advanced pattern recognition in large data sets. Generative AI offers specific potential for analysing unstructured data, capabilities that will be examined more closely in a future article.

Introducing AI, particularly generative AI, should begin with focused pilot projects targeting specific, high-value use cases, such as initial document review for tax provisions or contract analysis for tax implications. Driving adoption and managing risks requires integrating professionals directly into the AI workflow through the validation of outputs. This ‘human-in-the-loop’ oversight builds confidence and ensures accountability.

Aligning people, processes, and governance structures

Beyond technology and process design, transformation depends on clear governance and active organisational engagement. This relies on visible senior leadership backing, managers trained to support their teams during the transition, and internal champions assisting their peers.

Change management contributes to the success of the transformation. This typically includes executing communication strategies detailing objectives, operational impacts, and individual benefits. Addressing resistance proactively through targeted education on how new tools and processes augment professional expertise, rather than relying solely on mandates, is part of this approach. Involving staff in configuration, testing, and feedback promotes adoption and ownership. Structured, hands-on training focused on proficiency with new technologies and workflows builds user confidence and competence.

Furthermore, talent development plays a part. Career paths and performance metrics should be structured to recognise and reward professionals who build integrated expertise across tax law, technology, and process optimisation to support this goal. Investment in targeted upskilling programmes equips staff to utilise new technologies, interpret system outputs, and contribute to improvement initiatives.

Finally, performance measurement linked to transformation goals provides valuable insights. This can involve tracking metrics such as processing time reduction, error rate decreases, audit outcomes, or the identification of planning opportunities. Regular reviews of these metrics – ideally, quarterly – combined with feedback mechanisms such as team check-ins and usage surveys, can drive iterative improvements to technology, processes, and support structures.

The key takeaways on tax transformation

The authors’ experience consistently shows that delivering reduced compliance costs, better risk management, and greater strategic value requires integrated transformation. This involves addressing people, governance, process, data, technology, and the service delivery model holistically.

The successful approaches observed treat transformation as a foundation for ongoing, iterative improvement rather than a discrete project, effectively balancing technical implementation and change management to navigate complexity and enhance the tax function’s partnership with the business. Integrating these components improves outcomes and enhances the efficiency of tax functions.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
Gift this article