The platform economy: challenges and tax implications under DAC7 and VAT

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The platform economy: challenges and tax implications under DAC7 and VAT

Sponsored by

logo.png
Digital platforms on a mobile phone.jpg

Fernando Matesanz of Spanish VAT Services argues that reporting obligations for platform operators should be harmonised to prevent them from becoming ‘quasi-tax inspectors’ in a digital economy reshaped by servitisation

The digital economy, particularly through the phenomenon of ‘servitisation’ and the ‘platform economy’, has significantly transformed interactions between businesses, consumers, and tax administrations. This shift represents an evolution from a traditional ownership-based model to one centred on access to services. In this new landscape, consumers benefit from improved accessibility and usage conditions for goods and services, while businesses gain new opportunities to diversify their revenue streams.

The rise of servitisation

Servitisation is an increasing trend in which services are integrated into product offerings, progressively blurring the lines between goods and services. This shift has even led to the complete replacement of certain physical goods, such as records or books, with digital services such as streaming playlists. For instance, whereas few people today purchase vinyl records (a supply of goods), most subscribe to music streaming services (a supply of services). The implications of this new consumption pattern for VAT are immense.

The role of digital platforms

Digital platforms, defined as technological infrastructures that facilitate direct interactions between suppliers and multiple users, are at the core of the digital economy. Unlike the traditional economy, which relies on physical interactions between the parties involved in a transaction, digital platforms streamline and manage these interactions between providers and end consumers, acting as intermediaries or as active facilitators of commercial transactions. It is the legislator’s responsibility to ensure that the traditional economy is not unfairly disadvantaged compared to the platform economy. If both serve the same type of consumer (which is debatable in certain cases), they should be subject to the same tax treatment.

From a tax perspective, digital platforms play a crucial role in two key areas:

  • In the collection and transmission of data to tax administrations; and

  • In their responsibility for collecting and remitting VAT (deemed supplier provisions).

The former aspect is being particularly reinforced by European regulations, such as the DAC7 Directive (Council Directive (EU) 2021/514), which establishes due diligence obligations for digital platforms.

DAC7: strengthening administrative cooperation

The DAC7 Directive aims to enhance administrative cooperation in taxation by imposing obligations on digital platforms to collect, verify, and report detailed information about active sellers engaging in relevant activities, including so-called personal services. The information required includes tax identification details, addresses, the number of transactions conducted, the compensation received, and specific details in the case of real estate rentals.

DAC7 clearly defines key concepts such as platform, platform operator, and relevant activity. The platforms covered by the directive are those that facilitate direct or indirect commercial interactions between users, excluding those that merely process payments, conduct advertising services, or redirect users to other platforms, a definition that closely resembles that of a “facilitating platform” under VAT rules. Platform operators, which provide the infrastructure for transactions between sellers and consumers, must comply with strict reporting and verification obligations.

The directive distinguishes between active sellers, those subject to reporting, and those that are exempt. Active sellers are those that conduct transactions within the relevant reporting period. Reportable sellers include individuals or entities residing in the EU or in partner jurisdictions, and those engaging in activities such as property rentals within these territories. Exempt sellers include government entities, publicly listed companies, and those with minimal economic activity.

Non-compliance with DAC7 obligations can result in penalties, not only for platform operators but also for sellers subject to reporting. The directive establishes clear enforcement mechanisms, such as the temporary or permanent suspension of accounts and the withholding of payments until compliance with reporting requirements is ensured.

Harmonising reporting obligations: a necessary but complex task

The platform economy and servitisation represent deep shifts in both economic and tax models. Effective collaboration and coordination between digital platforms and tax administrations are essential to ensure transparency, efficiency, and fairness in tax collection. This new regulatory framework is not only intended to increase tax revenues but also to promote fiscal transparency and fairer competition in the digital marketplace.

Some platform operators argue that excessive bureaucratic requirements are being imposed on them, making their operations more complex and expensive. The DAC7 reporting obligation shares many similarities with the VAT record-keeping requirements for digital interfaces facilitating certain supplies of goods and services. In some cases, the information required is similar or even duplicated, but it must be stored in different ways and provided through separate procedures to different tax administrations, as each has distinct objectives.

Perhaps it is time to consider harmonising these reporting obligations in some way. It is a complex task, but it should not be dismissed. The collaboration of digital platforms is undeniably crucial in today’s economy, but turning them into quasi-tax inspectors (while also exposing them to penalties for non-compliance) may, in some cases, be excessive.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
The cuts disproportionately affected staff in certain positions, the report also found; in other news, MHA announced the €24m acquisition of Baker Tilly South East Europe
Gift this article