Egypt creates new window of opportunity to fulfil TP compliance requirements

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Egypt creates new window of opportunity to fulfil TP compliance requirements

Sponsored by

Saleh, Barsoum & Abdel Aziz – Grant Thornton Egypt logo.png
Egyptian flag

Nouran Ibrahim and Mahmoud Ashraf of Saleh, Barsoum & Abdel Aziz – Grant Thornton Egypt say taxpayers required to submit transfer pricing documentation could avoid penalties by acting in response to a recently published law

Egyptian Law No. 5 of 2025, which is part of the ‘tax facilitation package’ set to be implemented from this year, was published in the Official Gazette on February 12 2025. The law concerns the regularisation and settlement of the tax status of certain taxpayers, including those that have not submitted their tax returns for any period from 2020 up to the period prior to the law's effective date, and those that have submitted their tax returns but need to amend them due to oversight, error, or omitted data.

This article summarises Article 3 of Law No. 5 of 2025 and considers the implications of delayed/ non-submission of transfer pricing (TP) documentation reports for financial years from 2020 up to the period prior to the law's effective date.

Background

Article 13 of the Unified Tax Procedures Law (UTPL) for 2020 introduced TP-specific penalties that range from 1% to 3% of the value of the intercompany transactions in which a taxpayer engaged within the relevant taxable year for:

  • Non-disclosure of the related-party transactions in the annual income tax return; and

  • Failure to submit the master file, the local file, or the country-by-country (CbC) report/notification within the specified deadlines.

Article 3 of Egyptian Law No. 5 of 2025

Article 3 of the law addresses certain aspects of TP compliance requirements; specifically:

  • Non-filing of TP documentation – taxpayers that have not submitted their TP documentation (i.e., a master file, a local file, and a CBC report/notification) for any tax period from FY 2020 up to the period prior to the effective date of this law have the right to submit their documentation within six months from the law's effective date; and

  • Amendment of TP documentation or tax returns – taxpayers that have submitted their TP documentation or corporate income tax returns for the aforementioned tax periods have the right to submit amended returns in the case of oversight, error, or omitted data, without incurring delay fines or additional tax.

Consequently, the penalties stipulated in the UTPL will not apply, provided that the aforementioned returns/TP documentation stipulated in this article are submitted within six months from the law’s effective date.

TP implications – checkpoint

Tax functions should ask themselves the following questions to facilitate compliance:

  • Has the corporate tax return (CTR) transfer pricing disclosure been filled in correctly? Schedule 508 of the CTR transfer pricing disclosure should be checked in this regard.

  • Has all the three-tiered TP documentation been filled in? Have all the data, sections, and information requirements, as well as the rules, been fulfilled?

Recommendations

Based on Article 3 of Law No. 5 of 2025, the following actions are recommended:

  • Tax functions are strongly advised to expedite the preparation of any TP documentation for the period from 2020 up to the period prior to the law’s effective date that has not been submitted within the legal deadlines, and within the timeframe specified in Law No. 5; and

  • Schedule 508 in the CTR, related to the disclosure of related-party transactions, should be completed or amended, if it is incomplete or contains errors.

Taxpayers should take advantage of the waiver of financial penalties and sanctions stipulated in the law, provided that the required returns and documentation are submitted within six months from the law’s effective date.

Key takeaway for taxpayers

The tax facilitation package assists taxpayers in regularising their tax status and avoiding penalties. Companies operating in Egypt should make every effort to utilise the provisions.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
The cuts disproportionately affected staff in certain positions, the report also found; in other news, MHA announced the €24m acquisition of Baker Tilly South East Europe
Gift this article