Potential impact of Trump’s proposed tax reform on Mexican investors

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Potential impact of Trump’s proposed tax reform on Mexican investors

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-ritch-muller.png
chicago-516105.jpg

Santiago Llano and Ana Gabriela Ríos of Ritch Mueller explain the opportunities and challenges that a lowering of the US federal corporate tax rate would present for Mexican investors, and suggest several preparatory actions

During his presidential campaign, Donald Trump mentioned that his strategy to prioritise domestic manufacturing and to attract foreign manufacturers to the US would include the granting of tax incentives and benefits through a proposed tax reform that would focus on extending the Tax Cuts and Jobs Acts (TCJA) benefits that are set to expire at the end of 2025, lowering corporate tax rates, and promoting onshoring.

Although there is no formal proposal yet, President Trump has indicated plans to reduce the US federal corporate tax rate to 15% and this has garnered significant attention from domestic and international investors. While this aims to stimulate economic growth within the US, it also carries substantial implications for foreign investors, particularly those from Mexico.

This article aims to alert Mexican investors to certain effects this reform may have if adopted, especially in light of the preferential tax regime provisions in Mexico.

Overview of the proposed tax reform

A reduction of the federal corporate tax rate to 15% is intended to make the US a more attractive destination for business investments by lowering the tax burden on corporations. The Trump administration expects that this will lead to increased capital inflows, job creation, and overall economic growth in the US.

Implications for Mexican investors

For Mexican investors, a reduction in the US federal corporate tax rate would present both opportunities and challenges.

On the one hand, the lower tax rate could enhance the profitability of investments in US entities, making them more attractive.

On the other hand, this change could trigger the application of the Mexican controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules (REFIPRE, according to the regime’s Spanish acronym), which may bring considerable tax consequences for Mexican investors. REFIPRE is a Mexican anti-deferral regime for income generated by controlled foreign subsidiaries located in low-tax jurisdictions (territorial or taxed at a corporate income tax rate lower than 22.5%).

Mexican residents investing abroad are generally taxed once profits are effectively distributed; however, REFIPRE limits the deferral of Mexican income tax specifically in effectively controlled investments where the income tax applicable abroad is less than 22.5% and provided such income does not derive from business activities.

REFIPRE generally applies to passive income, which includes interest, dividends, royalties, capital gains, commission fees, profits derived from the disposition of real estate or of goods that are not physically located in the country, and leasing.

As such, this regime may result in Mexican taxpayers needing to anticipate the recognition of income deriving from the underlying investments and therefore pay taxes in Mexico regardless of whether profits are distributed by the US entity.

Furthermore, complex reporting obligations may arise for Mexican investors holding investments in the US. Failing to comply with such obligations may result in higher tax liabilities, including fines and potentially even imprisonment.

Consequences of the US being deemed a preferential tax regime

The reduction of the US federal corporate tax rate to 15% could classify the US as a jurisdiction with a preferential tax regime under Mexican law. As mentioned, this classification would result in several consequences for Mexican investors, including increasing the tax burden (mainly due to the avoidance of the deferral of income tax payment in Mexico) but also complex reporting requirements.

Although the current federal US corporate income tax rate of 21% already qualifies as a CFC regime, state taxes levied in the US are generally considered in the corresponding analysis, which currently results in most investments not falling within the Mexican CFC regime.

Strategic considerations for Mexican investors

Given the potential implications of the proposed US tax reform, Mexican investors should consider several strategic actions:

  • Review investment portfolios – investors should review their current and planned investments in US entities to assess the potential tax impact. This includes evaluating the profitability of these investments in light of the new tax rate and the potential additional tax burden in Mexico.

  • Verify if the CFC rules in Mexico are applicable to investments in the US and review compliance with the applicable obligations – the Mexican CFC rules are quite complex and to determine whether revenue generated by foreign investments falls within the scope of REFIPRE, a case-by-case analysis is required. Complex reporting obligations should be observed.

  • Stay informed – it is essential for investors to closely monitor developments related to the proposed tax reform. This will enable them to make informed decisions and adapt their strategies as needed.

Key takeaways

While a lowering of the US federal corporate tax rate to 15% could make US investments more attractive, it also raises significant tax implications under Mexican law. By understanding these implications and taking proactive steps, Mexican investors can navigate the complexities of REFIPRE and optimise their investment outcomes.

Additionally, this initiative comes amid recent actions related to the imposition of tariffs on Mexican imports, which is also expected to have a significant impact on the Mexican economy.

Mexican taxpayers investing in the US should continue to monitor the progress of this potential reform closely.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
Gift this article