Economic activities for Portuguese property transfer tax purposes: a closer look

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Economic activities for Portuguese property transfer tax purposes: a closer look

Sponsored by

cuatrecasas-logo-vector.png
magnifying-glass-6600300.jpg

Maria Inês Cotrim and Sofia Alves Pires of Cuatrecasas explain Portugal’s property transfer tax applied to share transfers and the tax authority’s interpretation of the non-allocation of real estate assets to economic activities requirement

Property transfer tax (IMT) is levied on the transfer for consideration of real property rights located in Portuguese territory. The transfer of shares in a company owning real estate located in Portugal may also be subject to IMT, if certain requirements are met.

This article focuses on one of the criteria for an IMT liability derived from the transfer of a real estate company – the non-allocation of real estate assets to economic activities – and the interpretation of the Portuguese tax authority (PTA) on this matter.

Property transfer tax on the transfer of shares: legal requirements

For the transfer of shares to be subject to IMT, the following cumulative requirements must be met under Article 2, No. 2, paragraph d of the Municipal Tax on Onerous Transfers of Property Code:

  • Property value – the value of the company's assets, direct or indirectly, is more than 50% derived from real estate located in Portugal, considering the balance sheet value or, if higher, the property taxable value;

  • Non-allocation – the real estate assets are not directly allocated to agricultural, industrial, or commercial activities, excluding the purchase and sale of properties; and

  • Shareholding – as a result of the transfer, a shareholder ends up holding at least 75% of the share capital.

The Portuguese tax authority’ interpretation

The PTA has been clarifying its interpretation of the non-allocation requirement through binding rulings issued upon requests by taxpayers, as follows.

Purchase and sale of real estate

Binding ruling No. 23404, dated June 30 2023, refers to a target company with a primary economic activity code (CAE) of real estate purchase and sale, and a secondary CAE of leasing. Upon incorporation (or a subsequent change of its business purpose), a company must identify the CAE corresponding to its business purpose.

In this case, the PTA concluded that – with the purchase and sale of real estate the primary activity, as indicated by the CAE – the transfer would be subject to IMT, even if the company carried out other secondary activities.

Therefore, the PTA adopted a formal approach, based on the primary CAE, regardless of whether the company carried out other economic activities besides the purchase and sale of real estate.

Leasing as a commercial activity

In binding ruling No. 25483, dated December 31 2023, the PTA states that leasing may be considered a commercial activity, as long as it is included in the company's corporate purpose and conducted as an economic business activity.

However, in the case at hand, although the target company leased a property, it did not have a CAE for this activity. For this reason, the PTA deemed that the property was not allocated to an economic activity, as there was no intention or organisation to exploit the property, and therefore the transfer of shares was subject to IMT.

Real estate development as a commercial activity

A particularly interesting case is that of real estate development, where the PTA seems to consider that it can be understood as an allocation of properties to an economic activity, provided there is actual proof of this allocation, as follows from binding ruling No. 25020, dated September 13 2023, relating to the participation exemption regime under corporate income tax rules.

Under this regime, capital gains and losses derived from the onerous transfer of shares and other associated equity instruments are not relevant for determining the taxable profit when, although 50% of the assets are composed of real estate or real rights over real estate in Portugal, they are allocated to agricultural, industrial, or commercial activities, excluding the purchase and sale of real estate.

Real estate development, as an economic activity, involves acquiring, constructing, or rehabilitating properties for subsequent sale or leasing, assuming the risk and responsibility of the business.

In this binding ruling, the PTA concluded that taxation should apply, as the company was not able to demonstrate, including through the accounting documents, that the properties held were effectively allocated to the activity of real estate development and owned for construction for sale.

Key takeaways on Portugal’s property transfer tax regarding share transfers

An analysis of the legal rules and the interpretation adopted by the PTA reveals the inherent complexity of applying IMT to the transfer of shares.

Therefore, determining whether a property is allocated to an economic activity that excludes taxation requires a thorough evaluation from both formal and substantive perspectives, including:

  • The company's corporate purpose and CAE;

  • The accounting record of the assets;

  • The actual activities conducted; and

  • Providing adequate evidence, including of the income obtained related to the economic activity.

While the binding rulings provide some guidance about the PTA’s possible interpretation, a case-by-case analysis is essential and should always be conducted.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
Gift this article