Pillar two: understanding its exemption for dividends and profit distributions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Pillar two: understanding its exemption for dividends and profit distributions

Pillar two is revising global tax competition with a 15% minimum tax rate

Bart Le Blanc and Daan Goedemoed of Norton Rose Fulbright offer practical advice on how to manage dividends and gains in various jurisdictions considering new pillar two rules

Large multinational enterprises with a global turnover of at least €750 million ($820 million) will be within the scope of pillar two.

The income inclusion rule (IIR) of the OECD’s pillar two proposal will generally impose an additional tax on the (ultimate or designated surrogate) parent company of the MNE group if a foreign subsidiary is effectively taxed below 15%. In this way, pillar two introduces a global minimum tax system with a minimum effective tax rate (ETR) of 15% at the jurisdictional level.

In numerous domestic tax regimes, local participation exemptions provide for a corporate income tax exemption for dividends and capital gains between group companies. Pillar two also provides for an exemption for ‘excluded dividends’ when calculating the net qualifying income used to determine the ETR.

The way that the pillar two exemption works will not, however, always align with the domestic law participation exemption, which can lead to a mismatch. This means that additional top-up tax may become due under pillar two in cases where the domestic participation exemption applies but there is no exemption under the pillar two rules.

This article discusses the treatment of dividends and capital gains that qualify for exemption under pillar two and offers suggestions for effectively managing dividends and gains in key jurisdictions such as the Netherlands, France, Germany and Luxembourg.

Calculation of the ETR


Under pillar two, additional tax obligations may arise if the ETR of a group entity in a specific jurisdiction is lower than 15%. The ETR is calculated by dividing the adjusted covered taxes (essentially, the taxes on the income or profit of all group entities in a state) by the net qualifying income, also referred to as GloBE income (essentially, the adjusted net profit or loss of all group entities in a state):

nrf pillar two article figure 1.png

Net qualifying income includes the qualifying income of all group entities established in a specific state, minus the qualifying losses incurred by group entities located within that state. Qualifying income or loss is ascertained from the net profit or loss of an entity based on financial reporting standards (this is calculated at the level of each group entity before the consolidation process and elimination of intra-group transactions).

Under pillar two, underlying profits are adjusted for excluded dividends and equity gains or losses.

Excluded dividends


The pillar two legislation broadly describes an excluded dividend as any dividend or similar distribution other than those arising as a result of an interest that is a short-term, portfolio holding.

A portfolio interest exists if the multinational group holds an interest entitling it to less than 10% of the profit, capital, reserves or voting rights of an entity.

That portfolio interest will be a short-term interest if it has been held by the member for less than one year. The holding period is assessed on a member-by-member basis, so where an interest is transferred between members of the group, a period for which a previous member held the interest is ignored.

Whether a portfolio interest is held by a group entity for a continuous period of at least one year is determined on the basis of beneficial ownership at the time of vesting of the dividend or distribution. Beneficial ownership exists when the group entity is entitled to all or substantially all of the benefits and burdens of ownership, including the right to the profits, capital or reserves associated with that interest.

In summary, the treatment of dividends under pillar two is as follows:

Dividends or other distributions obtained in or attributable to a reporting year from an:

Portfolio interest

(MNE group holds less than 10% of profit rights, capital interests, reserves or voting rights)

Non-portfolio interest

(MNE group holds 10% or more of profit rights, capital interests, reserves or voting rights)

Interest held for less than one year at time of distribution by group entity

Included when calculating qualifying pillar two income or loss

Excluded from qualifying pillar two income or loss

Interest held for more than one year at time of distribution by group entity

Excluded from qualifying pillar two income or loss

Excluded from qualifying pillar two income or loss

 

Mismatch with domestic participation exemptions


Participation exemptions within various domestic tax regimes also provide for a corporate income tax exemption on dividends and capital gains on disposals of equity interests between group companies. However, this can give rise to a mismatch in situations where the pillar two dividend exclusion does not fully align with the treatment of the same dividends under domestic tax laws.

If dividends or other distributions are exempt under domestic participation exemptions but do not meet the pillar two criteria for excluded dividends, there will be a higher amount of net qualifying income but no corresponding tax in the respective jurisdiction.

For example, in the Netherlands and France, a minimum shareholding percentage of 5% is required to apply the domestic participation exemption, but this does not meet the pillar two criteria for excluded dividends. This may result in a group entity being classified as a low-tax group entity so that additional tax could be due under pillar two.

Practical guidance


If dividends or other profit distributions are exempt under domestic participation exemptions but do not meet the pillar two criteria for excluded dividends, additional tax could be due under this new legislation.

This mismatch in the exemption criteria and the potential classification as a low-tax group entity could lower the ETR and lead to top-up tax liability. Careful consideration and strategic planning are crucial to mitigating such risks.

Situations like this may arise in joint ventures, where a person's shareholding may be below 10%, either wholly or as a result of share transfers. In such a case, the minority shareholder may want to defer receipt of a dividend until it has a qualifying interest for pillar two purposes.

To secure exemption under pillar two, companies must ensure that dividends or other distributions fulfil the criteria for being classified as excluded dividends. This necessitates confirming that on the vesting date of the dividend or distribution, the group’s members, between them, have qualifying interests that entitle them to 10% or more of the entity’s profits, capital, reserves, and voting rights. This interest must also have been held (without any intra-group transfer) for at least one year.

It is worth noting that, even if the 10% criterion is not initially met, dividends or other distributions can still qualify as excluded dividends if paid when the interest has been held for one year. This means that dividends can be paid after the one-year period, allowing the dividend to be considered an excluded dividend for tax purposes.

This strategic approach ensures not only compliance but also reduces the risk of additional taxation.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Originators, loan purchasers and securitisation vehicles may need to revisit servicing agreements and pricing after a key judgment narrowed the VAT credit management exemption
Opening doors for existing talent within Baker McKenzie and a desire for enhanced legal capabilities informed Ricardo Perera’s switch from KPMG
Boaz Goren’s move to the upstart PE-backed firm takes the number of senior UK tax professionals who have left EY this year to 13
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms
Gift this article