Australia: broadening of assets subject to CGT for foreign residents

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: broadening of assets subject to CGT for foreign residents

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
australia-canberra-4560441.jpg

Adam Smith of DLA Piper Australia reviews a raft of proposed Australian tax law changes, including a widened scope of capital gains tax for foreign residents

The Australian government on July 23, 2024 released details of its proposed changes to Australia's tax laws to ensure that capital gains tax is paid by foreign residents on the disposal of a broad range of infrastructure, property and mining related assets.

This initiative was first flagged in the federal budget on May 14 2024, when it was announced that legislative amendments will be introduced to "clarify and broaden the types of assets that foreign residents are subject to CGT on".

As indicated, the Australian Treasury released a consultation paper entitled Strengthening the foreign resident capital gains tax regime (the consultation paper). This consultation paper provides, for the first time, more specific details on what the federal government is proposing to tax. The following types of assets would likely be within the expanded CGT net:

  • Leases or licenses to use land situated in Australia, including (but not limited to) pastoral leases and licenses;

  • Australian water entitlements;

  • Infrastructure and machinery installed on land situated in Australia, including telecommunications, transport and mining infrastructure;

  • Energy infrastructure, including renewables such as wind turbines, solar panels, batteries, transmission towers, transmission lines and substations;

  • An option or right to acquire one of the above assets (or similar asset types with a close economic connection to Australian land and/or natural resources); and

  • A non-portfolio membership interest (of 10% or more) in an entity where more than 50% of the underlying entity’s market value is derived from the above assets.

This represents a significant change to and expansion of Australia's CGT regime. For example, based on the current law (which is uncertain due to conflicting court decisions), many foreign resident taxpayers have concluded that Australian wind and solar farms are not ‘real property’ (and are not a fixture on real property) for Australian CGT purposes. Therefore, they have not paid Australian tax on the disposal of such investments (including disposals of companies or trusts that own such assets).

If the consultation paper’s amendments are made, it is likely that a disposal by a foreign taxpayer of a company or trust that owns Australian renewable energy generation, storage and transmission infrastructure will be subject to Australian CGT.

Further, the purchaser will be required to withhold an amount from the purchase price on account of foreign resident capital gains withholding (FRCGW) tax.

These changes are proposed to apply to CGT events commencing on or after July 1 2025. The consultation paper is not seeking feedback on the broadening of the nature of assets that are subject to CGT, but rather is seeking feedback principally on other related reform proposals.

A high-level overview of the other matters addressed in the consultation paper is as follows:

  • Amending the principal asset test from a point-in-time test to a 365-day testing period. Broadly, the PAT is used to determine whether more than 50% of the market value of an entity's assets relates to taxable Australian real property;

  • Requiring foreign residents who dispose of shares or other membership interests (such as units) with a value of more than A$20 million (USD$13 million) to notify the Australian Taxation Office in an approved form prior to the transaction being executed. This notification requirement is aimed at transactions where a declaration is being made by the seller that it is not selling an 'indirect Australian real property interest' and therefore is not subject to tax; and

  • Broadening the CGT regime to capture the sale by foreign residents of economic interests in taxable Australian real property (for example, by using a total return swap).

Consultation on the above measures is open until August 20 2024.

Finally, concurrent with the above consultation paper, Treasury has also released exposure draft legislation to increase the FRCGW tax rate from 12.5% to 15%, and to reduce the FRCGW tax threshold from A$750,000 to nil. These two changes will apply from January 1 2025, assuming that the legislation is enacted in its current form.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article