EU removes Hong Kong from ‘grey list’ for tax purposes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU removes Hong Kong from ‘grey list’ for tax purposes

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
big waving realistic national colorful flag of european union and national flag of hong kong .

Lewis Lu and John Timpany of KPMG China report on the latest round of reviews of the EU’s list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes, with Hong Kong now off the EU grey list

On February 20 2024, the EU released an updated list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes.

It is encouraging to see that Hong Kong SAR has been removed from the grey list (i.e., Annex II of the list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes) after the implementation of the expanded foreign-sourced income exemption (FSIE) regime to cover foreign-sourced asset disposal gains in Hong Kong from January 1 2024. For more details on the expanded FSIE regime in Hong Kong, please see the article KPMG China published in January 2024.

Five other jurisdictions (Albania, Aruba, Botswana, Dominica, and Israel) were also removed from the grey list. Malaysia remains on the grey list. According to the EU Council conclusion, Malaysia has committed to amending or abolishing its FSIE regime and demonstrated tangible progress in 2022 and 2023, and was granted until March 31 2024 to adapt its legislation regarding the treatment of capital gains.

In addition, four jurisdictions were removed from the blacklist (i.e., Annex I of the list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes); namely, the Bahamas, the Turks and Caicos Islands, Belize, and the Seychelles. The EU now considers the Bahamas to be in compliance with the economic substance requirements for jurisdictions with no, or only a nominal, corporate income tax.

The updated blacklist now contains 12 jurisdictions, whereas the grey list includes 10 jurisdictions.

KPMG observations

KPMG welcomes the removal of Hong Kong from the EU’s grey list. It serves as a recognition of the Hong Kong government’s efforts in complying with the latest international tax standards and ensuring the FSIE regime in Hong Kong is not a harmful tax regime based on the EU’s latest requirements. The removal should also have a positive impact on consolidating Hong Kong’s status as an international financial centre and a sustainable market for investment.

On the other hand, with the implementation of the expanded FSIE regime in Hong Kong and the upcoming introduction of the global minimum tax/domestic minimum top-up tax in Hong Kong from 2025, multinational groups operating in Hong Kong need to carefully consider their business structures and operations for tax purposes and get prepared for the resulting increased complexity in their tax compliance obligations.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

APAs should provide a pragmatic means to agree to an arm's-length outcome for an Australian entity and for the ATO, the tax authority said
Overall revenues and average profit per partner also increased in the UK, the ‘big four’ firm revealed
Increasingly complex reporting requirements contributed towards the firm’s growth in tax, it said
Sector-specific business taxes, private equity tax treatment reform and changes to the taxation of non-residents are all on the cards for the UK, authors from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer predict
The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
Gift this article