Portugal’s late transposition of DAC7 and retroactive application of the law
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Portugal’s late transposition of DAC7 and retroactive application of the law

Sponsored by

Notes with the words Tax Penalty. Underpayment of estimated tax by person, financial institution or business. Taxation. Finance concept. Fine

Joaquim Pedro Lampreia and Carolina Telles Ferreira of Vieira de Almeida explain that Portugal’s tardiness in transposing the EU’s directive on administrative cooperation leaves online platform operators facing penalties through no fault of their own

Necessity is the mother of invention, just as late transposition of directives is the mother of unlawful solutions.

Council Directive (EU) 2021/514, of March 22 2021, amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation (DAC7) entered into force on April 11 2021. Coordinated transposition of the directive in all EU member states is particularly important, due to the cooperative nature of its regime, as is explained below.

DAC7 in a nutshell

The main objective of DAC7 is to “strengthen the fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance”.

DAC7 includes the obligation of online platform operators to provide information on sellers deriving income from activities facilitated by them, to one authority included in the list published by the European Commission in the Official Journal of the EU. The provision that platform operators may choose to register with the competent authority of a single member state (and only report to that member state) is aimed at reducing the administrative burden of platform operators.

The authorities included in the above-mentioned list receive information from registered platform operators and from the authorities of other member states and third countries (under bilateral and/or multilateral agreements and/or conventions) concerning other operators that have activities in several jurisdictions or are incorporated outside the EU.

The above set-up requires exchange of information mechanisms and administrative cooperation with third countries. It also requires the timely transposition of DAC7 by all member states, given the interdependence between authorities.

Transposition of DAC7

According to Article 2(1) of DAC7, “[m]ember States shall adopt and publish, by 31 December 2022, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof”.

Article 2(1) additionally provided that the member states shall apply the provisions of the directive from January 1 2023.

Notwithstanding, the directive was transposed in Portugal by Law 36/2023, of July 26 (the Transposition Law), which entered into force on July 27 2023.

Portugal was one of the 14 member states that received a letter of formal notice, from the European Commission, due to non-/partial notification of the national measures transposing DAC7.

The remaining member states transposed DAC7 as early as July 2022 (Austria and Slovakia), and September and October 2022 (Denmark and Ireland), while the majority complied in November and December 2022.

The Portuguese case: a retroactive application of the law

According to the Transposition Law, online platform operators shall report the information from January 1 2023 until the end of the year by February 29 2024. Failure to report the information in a timely fashion is punishable by a penalty ranging from €500 to €22,500.

Although the Transposition Law only entered into force on July 27 2023, online platform operators are required to report information from their sellers dating from January 1 2023, forcing them to gather and deliver information regarding past events.

This retroactive effect was included in the Transposition Law as a way to ‘correct’ the effects and consequences of the late transposition by Portugal. But in doing so, the Transposition Law puts an excessive legal burden on the online platform operators. In other words, Portugal is imposing the consequences of its own delay on the operators.

It is questionable whether the state can impose penalties if online platform operators are unable, for any reason, to comply with all the obligations concerning events that occurred prior to the entry into force of the Transposition Law (i.e., between January and the end of July 2023).

Non-compliance and penalties

According to the Single Market Scoreboard, Portugal’s average delay in transposing directives is 26.3 months, while the EU average is 18.3.

Also, according to the infringement decisions database of the European Commission, there have been 132 formal notices to Portugal regarding the late transposition of directives.

The late transposition of directives directly impairs the free market and the relations between parties, and between parties and the state.

In this regard, the late transposition of DAC7 creates the possibility for individuals to open proceedings against the Portuguese state (vertical direct effect), but not against other individuals (horizontal direct effect).

Considering that the information required from online platform operators relates to the sellers that use the platform, the obligation falling on the former is dependent on the information provided by the latter.

Will online platform operators be responsible if they are not able to obtain the information from the sellers regarding past events? The answer must be negative, since online platform operators have no legal mechanism to collect the information from the sellers and cannot cancel the service retroactively. This, in turn, means that no penalty should apply in these circumstances, given that it is not possible to demonstrate a wrongful conduct by the operator.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Mazars needs to do all it can to capitalise on TP as a growth area, ex-Deloitte TP director Jeremy Brown has told ITR
Sanjay Sanghvi and Raghav Bajaj of Khaitan & Co provide a practical guide for foreign investors looking to capitalise on Indian’s investment potential
The newly launched Tax Responsibility and Transparency Index will assess the ethicality of companies’ tax practices against global standards and regulations
The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
Gift this article