Australian thin capitalisation reforms delayed and PepsiCo Federal Court decision

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australian thin capitalisation reforms delayed and PepsiCo Federal Court decision

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
The House of Representatives

Jock McCormack of DLA Piper Australia reports on substantial amendments to the prior draft of Australia’s thin capitalisation reforms and a landmark ruling concerning the application of royalty withholding tax and diverted profits tax

In the first of two major developments, the proposed reforms to Australia’s thin capitalisation rules have been further delayed with the referral of the proposed amendments for a second time to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee on December 5 2023. Furthermore, in a broad-ranging decision, Moshinsky J of the Federal Court has held that certain payments made in relation to bottling agreements were royalties and thus subject to royalty withholding tax or that diverted profits tax would apply.

Thin capitalisation reforms

On November 28 2023, the government released substantial amendments to the prior draft of the thin capitalisation reforms. These amendments dealt with a broad range of measures impacting, among other things:

  • The third-party debt test;

  • The debt deduction creation rules; and

  • The meaning of ‘obligor group’ and ‘tax EBITDA’.

Following extensive consultation on these reforms, the proposed amendments were referred to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee, with a report due on or before February 5 2024.

These reforms were intended to align Australia’s interest limitation rules for multinationals with the OECD’s earnings-based best practice model, which allows affected taxpayers to deduct net interest expense up to a benchmark earnings ratio; i.e., 30% of the entity’s tax EBITDA (i.e., the primary test known as the fixed ratio test).

These proposed reforms have raised major issues and concerns, particularly impacting those involved in capital-intensive industries such as economic and social infrastructure, property, energy, and natural resources. Further issues related to the perceived retrospective application of the reforms continue to impact multinationals, as the principal changes were intended to apply from July 1 2023, with limited transitional concessions for existing debt arrangements.

PepsiCo v Commissioner of Taxation

On November 30 2023, the Federal Court handed down its decision in relation to PepsiCo, Inc. v Commissioner of Taxation, dealing with the application of royalty withholding tax and, in the alternative, diverted profits tax.

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) was successful in arguing that certain portions of the payments made in relation to bottling agreements were royalties and thus subject to royalty withholding tax, limited to 5% under the US–Australia double tax agreement. Furthermore, Moshinsky J held in principle that diverted profits tax would otherwise apply.

This is the first Australian court decision on diverted profits tax in Australia and is being closely monitored. The ruling strengthens the ATO’s armoury with regard to multinationals.

A significant component of the judgment focuses on determining the amount of the royalties (based on various experts’ advice) and the court in principle determined that the royalty component was 5.88% of Schweppes Australia Pty Limited’s net revenues from sales (subject to further revision/adjustment). The case dealt with the use of, or right to use, the relevant trademarks and other intellectual property.

Clearly, the PepsiCo decision will have wide-ranging implications for the access to, and use of, intellectual property across a broad range of sectors and on ATO rulings dealing with royalties and related matters, including the licensing/distribution of software and DEMPE of intangibles.

The decision might be expected to go on appeal and should be closely monitored.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Independent Schools Council is bringing litigation against the UK government for what it calls an ‘unprecedented education tax’
But the firm said that ‘difficult market conditions’ led to a slowdown in Asia Pacific; in other news, OECD begins Thailand accession process
The move will provide certainty to taxpayers and reduce the risk associated with pricing transactions for TP, according to India’s Ministry of Finance
Pia Honkala, co-head of Aibidia’s operational TP product, tells ITR how her company works in harmony with advisers like the ‘big four’ to revolutionise clients’ processes
The UK is ‘heading to Scandinavia’ as its tax burden increases and isn’t creating an attractive environment for a wave of investment, experts have told ITR
Japan, South Korea and Germany increased their R&D tax budgets at a much greater rate over a 14-year period, say RCK Partners and the London Business School
Under the proposed directive, multinationals with numerous EU presences would have to make only one filing to comply with pillar two
Robert Venables of Old Street Tax Chambers had previously brought multiple cases against HMRC on behalf of clients
No further action will be taken in relation to the four cases, however the regulator said it hopes to conclude five remaining investigations into PwC’s tax leaks scandal ‘as soon as possible’
The OECD also reported ‘political issues’ in reaching a consensus on amount B; in other news, PwC introduced new managing director roles as a partnership alternative
Gift this article