One step beyond the Portuguese transfer pricing rules on interest deductibility

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

One step beyond the Portuguese transfer pricing rules on interest deductibility

Sponsored by

cuatrecasas-logo-vector.png
money-965063.jpg

Ana Helena Farinha and Tiago Martins de Oliveira of Cuatrecasas say that the intragroup financing of Portuguese companies could be affected by a rule that is out of kilter with several other EU jurisdictions

Like many other jurisdictions, Portuguese corporate income tax (CIT) rules have several limitations on interest deductibility. The most common regulations correspond to the interest barrier rule (introduced in 2013, thereby replacing the thin capitalisation regime and establishing that interest may be deductible up to €1 million or 30% of tax-adjusted EBITDA) and the transfer pricing rules (under which, interest due between related parties should be deductible under the arm’s-length principle).

However, besides these rules (which are common to several EU tax systems), there is an additional limitation to the deductibility of interest, which states that interest related to shareholders’ loans should not be deductible for CIT purposes in the part that exceeds the interest rate fixed by a ministerial order, unless transfer pricing rules may be applied.

Under this wording, interest due to shareholders that are not qualified as related entities for transfer pricing purposes may not be fully deductible for CIT purposes, even if the interest rate is fixed at the market standard rates.

Considering that under the Portuguese transfer pricing rules, shareholders are generally only considered as related parties if the corresponding stake is higher than 20%, interest due to minority shareholders that have a stake below this threshold may, under this wording, not be fully deductible for CIT purposes.

Currently, the interest rate provided by the aforementioned ministerial order is the Euribor 12M plus a 2% spread (a 6% spread in the case of small and medium-sized companies), which was fixed in 2014 and has not been updated. Therefore, if a minority shareholder (with a stake lower than 20%) grants a shareholder loan to a Portuguese company that is not qualified as a small or medium-sized company at the current Euribor 12M rate plus a spread of 4%, this may lead to the conclusion that the interest corresponding to the excess 2% should not be deductible for CIT purposes.

Bearing in mind the above, this rule goes much beyond the interest barrier rule provided by Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive 3 and the transfer pricing rules commonly applied in several tax systems, and entails a distinction between:

  • Third-party financing and shareholders’ loans granted by a shareholder with a stake higher than 20%; and

  • Shareholders’ loans granted by a shareholder with a stake lower than 20%.

At first glance, there are no anti-avoidance or other tax reasons that justify this limitation on interest deductibility, which is directly fixed by a ministerial order and cannot consider all the changes on the interest rates market.

Finally, given the rapid increase of interest rates recently in the financial markets, this rule could represent a constraint to the financing of Portuguese companies through shareholder loans and is not aligned with other EU tax systems.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article