One step beyond the Portuguese transfer pricing rules on interest deductibility

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

One step beyond the Portuguese transfer pricing rules on interest deductibility

Sponsored by

cuatrecasas-logo-vector.png
money-965063.jpg

Ana Helena Farinha and Tiago Martins de Oliveira of Cuatrecasas say that the intragroup financing of Portuguese companies could be affected by a rule that is out of kilter with several other EU jurisdictions

Like many other jurisdictions, Portuguese corporate income tax (CIT) rules have several limitations on interest deductibility. The most common regulations correspond to the interest barrier rule (introduced in 2013, thereby replacing the thin capitalisation regime and establishing that interest may be deductible up to €1 million or 30% of tax-adjusted EBITDA) and the transfer pricing rules (under which, interest due between related parties should be deductible under the arm’s-length principle).

However, besides these rules (which are common to several EU tax systems), there is an additional limitation to the deductibility of interest, which states that interest related to shareholders’ loans should not be deductible for CIT purposes in the part that exceeds the interest rate fixed by a ministerial order, unless transfer pricing rules may be applied.

Under this wording, interest due to shareholders that are not qualified as related entities for transfer pricing purposes may not be fully deductible for CIT purposes, even if the interest rate is fixed at the market standard rates.

Considering that under the Portuguese transfer pricing rules, shareholders are generally only considered as related parties if the corresponding stake is higher than 20%, interest due to minority shareholders that have a stake below this threshold may, under this wording, not be fully deductible for CIT purposes.

Currently, the interest rate provided by the aforementioned ministerial order is the Euribor 12M plus a 2% spread (a 6% spread in the case of small and medium-sized companies), which was fixed in 2014 and has not been updated. Therefore, if a minority shareholder (with a stake lower than 20%) grants a shareholder loan to a Portuguese company that is not qualified as a small or medium-sized company at the current Euribor 12M rate plus a spread of 4%, this may lead to the conclusion that the interest corresponding to the excess 2% should not be deductible for CIT purposes.

Bearing in mind the above, this rule goes much beyond the interest barrier rule provided by Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive 3 and the transfer pricing rules commonly applied in several tax systems, and entails a distinction between:

  • Third-party financing and shareholders’ loans granted by a shareholder with a stake higher than 20%; and

  • Shareholders’ loans granted by a shareholder with a stake lower than 20%.

At first glance, there are no anti-avoidance or other tax reasons that justify this limitation on interest deductibility, which is directly fixed by a ministerial order and cannot consider all the changes on the interest rates market.

Finally, given the rapid increase of interest rates recently in the financial markets, this rule could represent a constraint to the financing of Portuguese companies through shareholder loans and is not aligned with other EU tax systems.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
She will formally take over the leadership of the private client firm in July next year, succeeding the veteran Margaret Robertson
Gift this article