Deloitte – APAC regional indirect tax interview

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Deloitte – APAC regional indirect tax interview

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
Richard Mackender.jpg

Interview with Richard Mackender, partner, Deloitte Singapore

1. What is the most significant change to your region/jurisdiction’s tax legislation or regulations in the past 12 months?

In the past 12 months, many tax authorities in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region have announced plans to introduce e-invoicing mandates that apply to sales of goods and services within their country. In some cases, the timelines have been short and, in some cases, the tax authorities have introduced the rules in stages to allow businesses to prepare. But in all cases, the rules differ from country to country.

2. What has been the most significant impact of that change?

Because there is no overarching standard for GST/VAT in the APAC region, the most significant impact is, therefore, an increase in complexity in operating in the APAC region. Businesses must navigate different data requirements, standards, and e-invoicing methods across the countries in which they operate so that they can be compliant. When considering compliance implementation, businesses need to stay ahead of any implementation dates to avoid unintentionally breaching an implementation deadline.

3. How do you anticipate that change impacting your work and the market moving forward?

There are both short- and long-term impacts. In the short term, businesses need to understand the rules and mandates in each relevant country, which drives opportunities for Deloitte to advise on the approach, platform, and data processes for businesses to stay compliant.

In the long term, tax authorities are likely to gain strong insights into business transactions given the data collected on e-invoicing and e-filing of returns. Thus, the tax environment is changing, and the nature of an indirect tax adviser’s role will also need to change.

4. How has this changed the way you offer tax advice?

Deloitte has recognised that it is not enough to be a specialist in the technical aspects of GST/VAT. In addition, our practitioners need to have an awareness of our clients’ systems and processes, as well as the tools available in the marketplace, so that we can help our clients stay compliant across the region. For example, Deloitte has developed alliance relationships with several key technology platforms and SaaS [software as a service] providers in the region.

5. What potential other legislative/regulatory changes are on the horizon that you think will have a big impact on your region/jurisdiction?

The other significant change we are watching closely relates to pending unilateral and multilateral free trade agreements. These agreements could well lead to realigned supply chain flows and new opportunities for businesses within the APAC region and internationally.

6. What are the potential outcomes that might occur if those changes are implemented?

Changes in trade flows mean impacts on our GST/VAT and customs businesses. We see the need for a more aligned customs brokerage offering that gives clients the confidence of accurately declared transactions and that provides a seamless service from classification, valuation, declaration, GST reporting, and disputes and controversy support. This sort of offering complements our multidisciplinary model in which we can bring other functions to support the client.

7. Do you think that change will have a positive effect on both your practice and the wider regional/jurisdictional market?

We certainly expect that these sorts of changes will bring opportunities for our indirect tax practices across the region. As noted above, we are exploring the broader cross-region impact of the change and how we can bring our multidisciplinary model to support the client in other adjacencies as well.

8. Are there any regulatory/legislative changes you believe should be implemented in your region/jurisdiction?

One area in which we have not seen much activity in the APAC region is environmental and sustainability taxation. This area of tax is one that governments in other regions have been using to effect change in business and consumer behaviours. Given the size of the region and the need to focus on managing the environment in a more sustainable way, it would be timely for governments to look at how effectively taxes can support this objective.

9. How do you believe those changes would help improve the tax landscape in your market?

We are not focusing so much on how these taxes would improve the tax landscape, but rather on how they would help to improve the general environment by focusing on negative externalities and shifting these external costs back to the source.

10. How are issues surrounding the taxation of the digital economy affecting your work?

Governments in the region have been focusing on digital taxation as we are seeing the enactment of electronic supplies of services rules (i.e., taxing low-value goods sold through e-commerce platforms) and electronic invoicing rules. These changes give rise to many challenges for our clients, from the need to understand the new rules, to system and process changes to meet compliance and reporting obligations. In such cases, clients need our help to navigate the changes and put in place their processes so that they can stay compliant, all of which create more opportunities for our business.

11. How would you describe the tax authorities’ approach in your region/jurisdiction?

One issue we encounter is that there is no overarching legislative body in the APAC region (unlike the European Union) and, as a result, the enactment of rules is specific to each jurisdiction within the region. Even if there are similarities, the rules differ in material ways from country to country.

The tax authorities in the APAC region have very different approaches to managing the compliance of taxpayers. Some tax authorities are more focused on processes and controls; others focus on forms and documents. The differences mean that, from a regional perspective, it is still essential to pay close attention to each local jurisdiction.

Tel: +65 6216 3270

E: rimackender@deloitte.com

This document has been prepared solely for the purpose of publishing in the 2024 ITR World Tax Guide and may not be used for any other purpose. This document and its contents may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person in whole or in part without Deloitte’s prior written consent.

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”). DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and related entities are legally separate and independent entities, which cannot obligate or bind each other in respect of third parties. DTTL and each DTTL member firm and related entity is liable only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of each other. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.

Deloitte provides industry-leading audit and assurance, tax and legal, consulting, financial advisory, and risk advisory services to nearly 90% of the Fortune Global 500® and thousands of private companies. Our people deliver measurable and lasting results that help reinforce public trust in capital markets, enable clients to transform and thrive, and lead the way toward a stronger economy, a more equitable society, and a sustainable world. Building on its 175-plus year history, Deloitte spans more than 150 countries and territories. Learn how Deloitte’s approximately 415,000 people worldwide make an impact that matters at www.deloitte.com.

This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”) is, by means of this  communication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser.

No representations, warranties or undertakings (express or implied) are given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in this communication, and none of DTTL, its member firms, related entities, employees or agents shall be liable or responsible for any loss or damage whatsoever arising directly or indirectly in connection with any person relying on this communication. DTTL and each of its member firms, and their related entities, are legally separate and independent entities.

© 2023. For information, contact Deloitte Global.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
The US president has raised India’s tariff rate to 50% because of its importation of Russian oil; in other news, firms made key international tax partner hires
Gift this article