Egypt issues further guidance on the application of TP rules
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Local Insights

Egypt issues further guidance on the application of TP rules

Sponsored by

Saleh, Barsoum & Abdel Aziz – Grant Thornton Egypt logo.png

Senior figures from Saleh, Barsoum & Abdel Aziz – Grant Thornton Egypt comment on the explanatory guide issued by the Egyptian Tax Authority regarding the application of TP rules in the country.

On September 19 2023, the Egyptian Tax Authority issued an Explanatory Guide on the Unified Tax Procedures Law, Law No. 206 of 2020, and its amendments under Law No. 211 of 2020 (the Law) related to the specific transfer pricing (TP) law articles; i.e., articles 12 and 13. This article will analyse the key aspects of the explanatory guide.

In detail

The explanatory guide (separate from the Egyptian TP guidelines) sheds some light on the application of articles 12 and 13 of the Law, whereby the guide reaffirms some existing concepts, and provides clarity and extended guidance with regard to other aspects mentioned under articles 12 and 13.

Local file deadline

The guide clarifies local file deadlines and provides examples to demonstrate how these are driven by the corporate tax return submission. The Law states that TP local files are to be filed within two months from the date of filing the annual corporate income tax returns (CTR).

Delay fines

It has finally been confirmed that penalties for failure to submit TP documentation, as outlined under Article 13 of the Unified Tax Procedures Law, are not subject to delay fines as outlined under Article 110 of the Corporate Income Tax Law.

Dividends distribution

It has been confirmed that dividends distributions are not considered related-party transactions.

Transactions impacting the financial position statement (balance sheet)

It has been confirmed that related-party transactions that have an impact on a taxpayer’s financial position statement (balance sheet transactions) must be disclosed under Schedule 508 of the CTR.

It is important to note that according to Article 14 of the Law’s executive regulations, the determined threshold above which local and master files are required to be maintained (currently EGP 8 million) should be calculated in terms of revenues and expenses during the fiscal year; i.e., based on income statement items. This should mean that, while balance sheet transactions should be disclosed within table 508 and would likely be inspected upon audit, these transactions should not have an effect on the calculation of the EGP 8 million threshold.

Another important point when disclosing balance sheet transactions is that they should represent the effect of the financial year being documented; i.e. the movement and not the balance.

Payments on behalf transactions

It has been confirmed that transactions involving payments made on behalf of related parties – along with any remuneration, if applicable – must be disclosed under Schedule 508 of the CTR and within the local file.

Joint ventures

The guide defines a joint venture (JV) as a contractual arrangement resulting from an agreement between resident persons, between branches of non-resident companies, or between a resident person and a branch of a foreign company, each according to the percentage of participation in the profits for the purpose of implementing a project. This arrangement expires with the completion of this project, and the rights and duties for this project are limited to the division of profits and losses that arise from the work of this JV.

It further clarifies that group affiliates to any one of the parties of the JV are considered related to the JV party, as per the definition of a ‘related person’ under the Unified Tax Procedures Law. As such, any transactions between the JV and the group affiliates should be disclosed under Schedule 508 of the party’s CTR, within the percentage of participation in the JV. Likewise, the affiliated entity to the JV party should also disclose the transaction under table 508. Please see the diagram below for ease of reference.


According to the above diagram, Company A should disclose the transaction with the JV under Schedule 508 in its CTR, within its percentage of participation in the JV. Typically, Company B and the affiliate of Company A are also not related parties, unless any of the conditions pertaining to the definition of a related person applies to them.

Free zone entities

Affiliate entities of a free zone parent or holding company must prepare and submit the master file at the time of local file submission.

Key takeaway

The explanatory guide provides guidelines regarding obligations for compliance with articles 12 and 13 of the Unified Tax Procedures Law. Compliance with this guide is essential for businesses operating in Egypt to ensure accurate and timely submission of relevant documentation and disclosures related to intercompany transactions.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Rema Serafi, KPMG’s first-ever female vice chair for tax, talks about breaking the mould in an exclusive interview with ITR
The metal multinational’s victory, in a case worth $12 million, continues the trend of companies coming out on top against India’s revenue department
Guy Bud and Matthew Greene from litigation firm Stewarts review a dispute on tiered partnerships, which raises questions on corporation tax and partnership law
The stagnating pay and tax bonuses cap follow slashed payouts for the deals team and business consolidation in the last month
A greater UN role has been secured after disagreements between developed and developing countries over the OECD’s influence in global tax reform
The US-based firm picks up investment fund specialist Ceinwen Rees, while Ireland nearly doubles its corporation tax receipts in three years
The order comes amid controversy over another of David Collard’s companies’ tax and TP affairs
NASSCOM, which represents over 3,000 Indian companies, has argued for the removal of the segmentation rule
The chancellor claims it is the largest business tax cut in modern British history
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make nominations for the 2024 ITR Tax Awards in the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific