Self-hosted wallets and decentralised crypto exchanges: DAC 8's Achilles’ heel
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Local Insights

Self-hosted wallets and decentralised crypto exchanges: DAC 8's Achilles’ heel

Sponsored by

sponsored-firm-mlgts.jpg
euro-4516001.jpg

Bernardo Mesquita of Morais Leitão reviews the EU’s latest regulatory efforts to ensure that tax compliance for crypto-assets is fully realised.

On May 16 2023, the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of the EU reached an agreement on adopting the proposal to amend the EU Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC), intending to extend the exchange of information regime to cover crypto assets and e‑money (DAC8).

In practice, reporting crypto-asset service providers (RCASPs) (meaning any person whose business is the provision of one or more crypto‑asset services to third parties on a professional basis, and crypto‑asset operators that do not fall under the scope of markets in crypto assets [MiCA] regulation), will be required to carry out due diligence procedures to identify and report transactions of clients residing in the EU to the competent tax authorities. Subsequently this information will be exchanged by the recipient’s member state with the tax authorities of the member state where the reportable client is a tax resident. The information to be exchanged includes identification details of the reportable client, identification details of the RCASP and details of the reportable transaction.

The rules contained in DAC8 are largely consistent and must be considered alongside the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), approved by the G20 in November 2022, which aims to provide a global tax transparency framework for the automatic exchange of tax information on crypto-asset transactions. Since the OECD has not yet developed its implementation framework, by agreeing on the DAC8, the EU has moved ahead of the OECD in the implementation of CARF.

Although the proposed amendment constitutes a crucial tax policy tool to fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance within the crypto-assets market, it will not cover all relevant transactions of crypto-assets. This is because DAC8 rules are conceived similarly to DAC2/ Common Reporting Standard (CRS) rules and thus are based on the belief that crypto-asset users rely on CASPs to own or transact crypto-assets.

Consequently, DAC8 rules are unable to tackle the problems that arise with self-hosted crypto wallets (SHCWs) and decentralised crypto exchanges (DCEs). SHCWs, unlike custodial wallets, are wallets where the owner has full control over their private key and, therefore, can transact crypto-assets online without the involvement of an intermediary. DCEs meanwhile are peer‑to‑peer marketplaces where transactions occur directly between crypto‑asset users, without the involvement of a centralised intermediary (i.e., no one exercises control or sufficient influence over the market platform). Therefore, despite DAC8 being an effective mechanism to compel third‑party reporting by centralised institutions involved in trading crypto‑assets, it cannot encompass peer-to-peer transactions.

Although the current percentage of crypto-asset transactions that are conducted peer-to-peer is uncertain, it is very likely that as information reporting becomes more effective under DAC8 rules, trading activity will shift to DCEs as a means of circumventing the referred rules. For this reason, additional approaches to DAC8 should be implemented to mitigate this problem, such as requiring information reporting not only by CASPs but from the miners of the crypto-assets themselves (at least from the ones who have a de facto concentration of decision-making power). EU taxpayers could also be required to report their crypto-assets located in self-hosted wallets, provided they have a significant monetary value.

Although it is commendable that the EU took a forefront role in transposing the CARF and the OECD’s amendments to the CRS, soon it will need to combat the loopholes of DAC8 raised by SHCWs and DCEs, so that tax compliance on crypto-asset income becomes fully realised.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Labour Party is working hard to convince business that it will bring stability to tax policy if it wins the next UK general election. But it will be impossible to avoid creating winners and losers
Burrowes had initially been parachuted into the role last summer to navigate the fallout from the firm’s tax leaks scandal
Barbara Voskamp is bullish on hiring local talent to boost DLA Piper’s Singapore practice, and argues that ‘big four’ accountants suffer from a stifled creativity
Chris Jordan also said that nations have a duty to scrutinise the partnership structures of major firms, while, in other news, a number of tax teams expanded their benches
KPMG has exclusive access to the tool for three years in the UK, giving it an edge over ‘big four’ rivals
But the US tax agency’s advice is consistent with OECD guidance and shouldn’t surprise anyone, other experts tell ITR
A survey of more than 25,000 in-house counsel reveals that diversity initiatives are a high priority when choosing external counsel
The report is aimed at helping 'low-capacity countries', the OECD has claimed
The UK tax agency appears to be going after easier, lower value targets, one lawyer has claimed
Criminal experts have told ITR that the case of Ulf Johannemann emphasises the fine line between tax avoidance and tax evasion
Gift this article