Top 10 takeaways from the KPMG Asia Pacific Tax and Legal Summit
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Top 10 takeaways from the KPMG Asia Pacific Tax and Legal Summit

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
mountain-2571058.jpg

The days of tax being just a private compliance issue for tax teams are long gone; tax transparency is now a core pillar of sustainability, say Jenny Wong of KPMG Australia and Loek Helderman of KPMG International.

The 2023 KPMG Asia Pacific Tax and Legal Summit took place from May 23–25 2023 in Singapore, where a delegation of nearly 900 tax professionals convened to explore the developments on the horizon across a number of areas, including the OECD BEPS 2.0 initiative, the future of tax administration, the digital future of tax, the ESG agenda, and the tax developments across a number of sectors.

One of the key topics featured at the summit was navigating ESG and the tax environment. KPMG professionals discussed how tax transparency is now a core pillar of sustainability, leading to a movement of new global standards.

The sessions explored the practical implications of the move to mandatory public country-by-country (CbC) reporting, as has been seen in the EU, Australia and the US.

The days of tax being just a private compliance issue for tax teams are long gone.

Multinational groups have a global footprint in many countries, which means they are potentially facing the challenge of managing overlapping and inconsistent mandatory public CbC reporting rules.

Outlined below are key takeaways from the ESG and tax transparency breakout sessions.

  • In the short term, organisations will need to undertake a ‘gap analysis’ to comply with new tax transparency legislative frameworks such as public CbC reporting. The long term offers an opportunity to transform a reporting and compliance exercise into a more strategic exercise for organisations to enable enhanced communication with key stakeholders.

  • With the move to public tax transparency reporting, organisations will need to not only be comfortable with the CbC reporting information being made public but be in a position to be able to utilise CbC data for multiple purposes, including applying BEPS pillar two safe harbours, transfer pricing and tax reporting generally. There are also considerations around managing large volumes of tax data and how to process, analyse and report data in real time and more efficiently with the use of technology.

    Having predictable and stable tax policies is viewed as an important factor in doing business in particular locations
  • Tax functions are increasingly under pressure to incorporate ESG factors in decision making. Tax functions are moving the focus beyond corporate income tax contributions and working collaboratively with the business to understand the supply chain and how new environmental taxes and incentives impact their supply chains. There is also a need to track environmental taxes and incentives and apply them consistently across the business.

  • Tax transparency is one of the key pillars in ESG to help to build trust in the communities in which organisations operate. Having predictable and stable tax policies in these countries is viewed as an important factor in doing business in particular locations. Organisations that are transparent in their tax affairs are generally seen as socially responsible, which, in turn, will make it easier to do business in that location.

  • Tax transparency is more than just words in a report – it is backed up by strategy, commitment and action on the organisation’s tax and sustainability strategy. It is also an element of the company’s purpose.

  • External stakeholders such as civil society groups and non-governmental organisations are increasingly interested in the tax affairs of large organisations and it is crucial to be able to be transparent and be able to respond to stakeholder questions. Some disclosures in tax transparency reports have been deliberate in responding to external stakeholder feedback and the reports have been subject to a continuous improvement process over the years as a result.

  • The implementation of tax technology to automate the reporting of multiple tax data sets for general tax, compliance, CbC, and BEPS pillar two reporting processes is high on the agenda for some organisations.

  • Sustainable finance also plays a key role in shaping ESG agendas for customers of financial institutions that meet sustainability objectives. Tax can play a key part in this through lowering the levies, tax charges or incentives that can be passed on to customers in the form of lower-cost green financing.

  • Public tax reporting requires organisations to revisit corporate governance processes to ensure strong governance processes and control frameworks are in place to support an organisation’s public narrative and the validation of tax data. Re-examining the governance around tax data being disclosed also helps organisations to understand what they are paying to enable business decision making but also prepares them for further scrutiny from global regulators. Tax teams should also work with their corporate affairs team on a communication strategy to explain complex tax data publicly to external stakeholders.

  • Organisations are under pressure to disclose more beyond the mandatory regulatory requirements, with some including detailed BEPS pillar two-related voluntary disclosures, but are also faced with the challenge of balancing the need to provide more disclosures given existing resources and the need to annually maintain the aspiration of a high standard of disclosures in tax transparency reporting.

Read the original version of the article on KPMG’s website.

Click here to access more KPMG Future of Tax content.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The firm’s new Asia-Pacific head James Badenach tells ITR that A&M Tax can provide an alternative in the region to a “constrained” ‘big four’
As the firm declined to speak with ITR over its progress, senator Deborah O’Neill branded PwC Australia’s recent parliamentary responses as ‘unsatisfactory’
A Swedish company’s CEO working part-time in Denmark led to a noteworthy PE decision; in other news, Latham & Watkins grew its London tax team
Rather than outright replace human intelligence, AI solutions can serve as the ‘infinite intern’ tax advisers need to automate onerous tasks, argues Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
The lack of provision for bilateral advance pricing agreements is a notable omission from proposed reforms of Brazil’s transfer pricing rules
Ursula von der Leyen is under pressure to ensure her new team makes competitiveness a top priority. How tax policy is designed and implemented is crucial, writes Ralph Cunningham
Speaking exclusively at ITR’s Transfer Pricing Forum in Europe, the Commission’s Marc Clercx also addressed industry concerns over the arm’s-length principle
After a protracted offensive from 10 Australian professional bodies, a Senate motion to strike out contentious new tax ethical rules has failed, but concessions were secured
The closely watched decision represents the final nail in the coffin for Apple and serves as a warning to other multinationals, experts have suggested
UK tax advisers have branded Reeves’ pledge to cap corporation tax at 25% as “a smart move” and “an easy give”
Gift this article