A new regulation in Poland explained: family foundations and their taxation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

A new regulation in Poland explained: family foundations and their taxation

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
child-4042446.jpg

Justyna Bauta-Szostak and Bartosz Głowacki of MDDP report on the introduction of family foundations in Poland, and how they will be taxed.

On January 26 2023, the lower house of the Polish parliament, the Sejm, passed the Family Foundation Act, which will enter into force in May 2023. The purpose of a family foundation, which is a new structure for Poland, is to accumulate wealth and manage it in the interest of the beneficiaries. For this purpose, the foundation is allowed to carry on business, though it is limited to investment activity of a rather passive nature. Not every sort of business is allowed.

A family foundation can be a shareholder in companies and partnerships, both seated in Poland and abroad. It may not only buy shares but also incorporate companies and partnerships. It can benefit from all the rights of a shareholder/partner.

The ability to participate in various entities extends to the financial activity of the foundation. It may finance subsidiaries and the beneficiaries with interest-bearing loans. What is important and very welcome is that the foundation is allowed to invest in financial markets. It may buy and sell stocks and other securities, as well as other financial instruments. The foundation is allowed to rent or lease property. The foundation may even be involved in farming, in that it may own a farm and be involved in agricultural production.

However, the relatively wide range of permitted activities for a foundation does not include speculation. The law provides for a ban on activities consisting of disposing of property/assets acquired solely for this purpose, which means that a foundation cannot run a factory or a warehouse. This is primarily designed to prevent abuse.

The above should not be understood as a total ban on taking advantage of business opportunities (i.e., buy cheaply and sell expensively), but the context is crucial. For example, if on one day the foundation receives shares that have been owned for years by someone else, and sells those shares shortly after, this may raise doubts. However, if a family foundation buys artwork or precious metals or gems as an investment and there is an opportunity to sell those at a profit, such a situation should not be controversial.

The tax treatment of foundations

As a rule, a foundation is exempt from corporate income tax (CIT) unless it carries on business which is not allowed. In that case, the profit will be subject to 25% CIT. This rate is significantly higher than the basic income tax rates (9%/19%), which unequivocally confirms its punitive nature.

In the remaining permitted scope, a family foundation will pay income tax only in relation to distributions to the beneficiaries. So until the assets are managed and if there is no distribution, there is no tax. Distribution triggers 15% CIT on the market value of the distribution, which may be in cash or in kind. If the distribution is made to close family members or to the founder, there is no personal income tax (PIT). If the distribution is made outside this group, 10% or 15% PIT is imposed.

Regardless of this, the foundation will be subject to the 0.035% wealth tax levied on buildings with a total value exceeding PLN 10 million (approximately $2.4 million) if they are rented by the foundation.

Final thoughts

A family foundation is an interesting solution for managing private assets. It does not seem to be a tax vehicle – the characteristics of a foundation should be considered less important – but a proper ownership structure allows the investment of family wealth without an additional tax burden.

That said, a family foundation could be effective if the whole structure and assets are well considered and the foundation itself is for bona fide family reasons.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article